Finite mixture modeling approach for developing crash modification factors in highway safety analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the relative performance of two models (negative binomial (NB) model and two-component finite mixture of negative binomial models (FMNB-2)) in terms of developing crash modification factors (CMFs). Crash data on rural multilane divided highways in California and Texas were modeled with the two models, and crash modification functions (CMFunctions) were derived. The resultant CMFunction estimated from the FMNB-2 model showed several good properties over that from the NB model. First, the safety effect of a covariate was better reflected by the CMFunction developed using the FMNB-2 model, since the model takes into account the differential responsiveness of crash frequency to the covariate. Second, the CMFunction derived from the FMNB-2 model is able to capture nonlinear relationships between covariate and safety. Finally, following the same concept as those for NB models, the combined CMFs of multiple treatments were estimated using the FMNB-2 model. The results indicated that they are not the simple multiplicative of single ones (i.e., their safety effects are not independent under FMNB-2 models). Adjustment Factors (AFs) were then developed. It is revealed that current Highway Safety Manual's method could over- or under-estimate the combined CMFs under particular combination of covariates. Safety analysts are encouraged to consider using the FMNB-2 models for developing CMFs and AFs.

[1]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[2]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Examining the effects of site selection criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of traffic safety countermeasures. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Development of adjustment functions to assess combined safety effects of multiple treatments on rural two-lane roadways. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  James A Bonneson,et al.  Development of Accident Modification Factors for Rural Frontage Road Segments in Texas , 2007 .

[5]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  DEVELOPING MEDIAN BARRIER INSTALLATION GUIDELINES: A BENEFIT/COST ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[6]  J. Mclean,et al.  REVIEW OF ACCIDENTS AND RURAL CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS INCLUDING ROADSIDES. , 1996 .

[7]  Xiugang Li,et al.  Predicting motor vehicle crashes using Support Vector Machine models. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Generalized nonlinear models for rear-end crash risk analysis. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Srinivas R. Geedipally,et al.  A semiparametric negative binomial generalized linear model for modeling over-dispersed count data with a heavy tail: Characteristics and applications to crash data. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  E. Hauer.  Even Perfect Regressions May Not Tell the Effect of Interventions , 2013 .

[11]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Exploration and comparison of crash modification factors for multiple treatments on rural multilane roadways. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  D. Lord,et al.  Accident Modification Factors for Medians on Freeways and Multilane Rural Highways in Texas , 2008 .

[13]  Yuanchang Xie,et al.  Predicting motor vehicle collisions using Bayesian neural network models: an empirical analysis. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  The Art of Regression Modeling in Road Safety , 2014 .

[15]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[16]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Development of Tools for Evaluating the Safety Implications of Highway Design Decisions , 2007 .

[17]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  Developing Guidelines for Median Barrier Installation , 2005 .

[18]  Yajie Zou,et al.  Validation of Crash Modification Factors Derived from Cross-Sectional Studies with Regression Models , 2015 .

[19]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Cause, effect and regression in road safety: a case study. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Evaluation of safety effectiveness of multiple cross sectional features on urban arterials. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Assessing the safety effects of multiple roadside treatments using parametric and nonparametric approaches. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Integrated traffic conflict model for estimating crash modification factors. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Chungwon Lee,et al.  Finite mixture modeling for vehicle crash data with application to hotspot identification. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Multilevel Dirichlet process mixture analysis of railway grade crossing crash data , 2016 .

[25]  J. Bonneson.  ROLE AND APPLICATION OF ACCIDENT MODIFICATION FACTORS IN THE HIGHWAY DESIGN PROCESS , 2003 .

[26]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Application of finite mixture models for vehicle crash data analysis. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter,et al.  Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models , 2006 .

[28]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data , 2016 .

[29]  Frank Gross,et al.  Safety Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Width Combinations on Rural, Two-Lane, Undivided Roads , 2009 .

[30]  Simon Washington,et al.  Validation of Accident Models for Intersections , 2005 .

[31]  Roger P Bligh,et al.  Part 1: Roadside Safety Design: Developing Guidelines for Median Barrier Installation: Benefit-Cost Analysis with Texas Data , 2005 .

[32]  J. Rice.  Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[33]  Yajie Zou,et al.  Application of finite mixture of negative binomial regression models with varying weight parameters for vehicle crash data analysis. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.