Investigation on flow and mixing characteristics of supersonic mixing layer induced by forced vibration of cantilever

Abstract The mixing process has been an important issue for the design of supersonic combustion ramjet engine, and the mixing efficiency plays a crucial role in the improvement of the combustion efficiency. In the present study, nanoparticle-based planar laser scattering (NPLS), particle image velocimetry (PIV) and large eddy simulation (LES) are employed to investigate the flow and mixing characteristics of supersonic mixing layer under different forced vibration conditions. The indexes of fractal dimension, mixing layer thickness, momentum thickness and scalar mixing level are applied to describe the mixing process. Results show that different from the development and evolution of supersonic mixing layer without vibration, the flow under forced vibration is more likely to present the characteristics of three-dimensionality. The laminar flow region of mixing layer under forced vibration is greatly shortened and the scales of rolled up Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices become larger, which promote the mixing process remarkably. The fractal dimension distribution reveals that comparing with the flow without vibration, the turbulent fluctuation of supersonic mixing layer under forced vibration is more intense. Besides, the distribution of mixing layer thickness, momentum thickness and scalar mixing level are strongly influenced by forced vibration. Especially, when the forcing frequency is 4000 Hz, the mixing layer thickness and momentum thickness are 0.0391 m and 0.0222 m at the far field of 0.16 m, 83% and 131% higher than that without vibration at the same position, respectively.

[1]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Interaction of Adjacent Synthetic Jets in an Airfoil Separation Control Application , 2003 .

[3]  Shihe Yi,et al.  Supersonic flow imaging via nanoparticles , 2009 .

[4]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes , 1995 .

[5]  Lin He,et al.  Study of density field measurement based on NPLS technique in supersonic flow , 2009 .

[6]  Li Yan,et al.  Performance evaluation and parametric analysis on cantilevered ramp injector in supersonic flows , 2013 .

[7]  Vincent J. Harrand,et al.  ACTIVE VORTICAL FLOW CONTROL FOR ALLEVIATION OF TWIN-TAIL BUFFET OF GENERIC FIGHTER AIRCRAFT , 2001 .

[8]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Near-Field Investigation of Chevron Nozzle Mechanisms , 2008 .

[9]  A. Roshko,et al.  The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Nickolay Smirnov,et al.  Hydrogen fuel rocket engines simulation using LOGOS code , 2014 .

[11]  D. W. Bogdanoff,et al.  Compressibility Effects in Turbulent Shear Layers , 1983 .

[12]  John M. Seiner,et al.  Historical Survey on Enhanced Mixing in Scramjet Engines , 2001 .

[13]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Actuators for Active Flow Control , 2011 .

[14]  Michael Schäfer,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on a laminar fluid-structure interaction reference test case , 2011 .

[15]  Corin Segal,et al.  The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics , 2009 .

[16]  Jun Liu,et al.  Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows , 2012 .

[17]  Alicia M. Williams,et al.  Laminar mixing using oscillating cantilevered ionic polymer actuators , 2009 .

[18]  T. Rossmann An experimental investigation of high compressibility mixing layers , 2001 .

[19]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Mixing Enhancement in Supersonic Free Shear Flows , 1995 .

[20]  D. Bohl,et al.  Near Exit Plane Effects Caused by Primary and Primary-Plus-Secondary Tabs , 1999 .

[21]  Dennis K. McLaughlin,et al.  An experimental investigation of large scale instabilities in a low Reynolds number two-stream supersonic shear layer , 1992 .

[22]  Tarek Abdel-Salam,et al.  Effects of Ramp Side Angle in Supersonic Mixing , 2003 .

[23]  Michael Yianneskis,et al.  Decomposition of Flow Structures in Stirred Reactors and Implications for Mixing Enhancement , 2008 .

[24]  M. Ebrahimnejad,et al.  Finite volume analysis of adaptive beams with piezoelectric sensors and actuators , 2014 .

[25]  Akira Yoshizawa,et al.  A Statistically-Derived Subgrid-Scale Kinetic Energy Model for the Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows , 1985 .

[26]  Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri,et al.  Texture Segmentation Using Fractal Dimension , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  Giuseppe Pezzella Aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic trade-off analysis of a small hypersonic flying test bed , 2011 .

[28]  Liu Weidong,et al.  Experimental investigation of the micro-ramp based shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction control , 2012 .

[29]  In-Su Kang,et al.  2D planar jet control for manipulating the separation bubble behind the vertical fence , 2011 .

[30]  Jin-Soo Cho,et al.  Flow disturbances depending on excitation frequency on a flat plate by a piezoceramic actuator , 2013, J. Vis..

[31]  Roger H.J. Grimshaw,et al.  Wave Action and Wave-Mean Flow Interaction, with Application to Stratified Shear Flows , 1984 .

[32]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  A free-jet experimental study on the performance of a cavity-type ramjet , 2011 .

[33]  Michael G. Olsen,et al.  Planar velocity measurements in a weakly compressible mixing layer , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  S. Goebel,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF COMPRESSIBLE TURBULENT MIXING LAYERS , 1991 .

[35]  C. L. Ribault Large Eddy simulation of passive scalar in compressible mixing layers , 2008 .

[36]  M. G. Mungal,et al.  Planar velocity measurements in compressible mixing layers , 1997 .

[37]  Noel T. Clemens,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional effects in the supersonic mixing layer , 1990 .

[38]  Christian Cierpka,et al.  Flow field around a vibrating cantilever: coherent structure eduction by continuous wavelet transform and proper orthogonal decomposition , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[39]  Paul E. Dimotakis,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of mixing in a recirculating shear flow , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.