Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur

Abstract Objectives The aims of the present study were to establish improved reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur, and to determine the effect of fetal and maternal factors. Study design This prospective longitudinal study included 650 low-risk pregnancies. Outer–outer biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), mean abdominal diameter (MAD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were measured by ultrasound, and the statistical analysis was based on regression analysis and multilevel modeling. Results Reference percentiles for the growth of MAD, AC and FL showed continuous growth in gestational week 10–40, while BPD and HC showed a slightly blunted growth toward the end of pregnancy. FL was the only variable that was not influenced by gender. There was a significant negative association between breech presentation and all five biometrical variables, while maternal weight was positively associated with all five variables. Cephalic index significantly influenced BPD and HC. Maternal height had a positive effect on BPD, HC, AC and FL, and parity had a positive effect on MAD and AC, while smoking influenced negatively HC, MAD, and FL. Terms for calculating conditional reference values and customisation for individualised growth assessment are presented. Conclusions New reference charts for the growth of fetal head, abdomen and femur are suggested for assessing fetal size and growth, and can be adjusted for maternal and fetal factors to suite individual pregnancies.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  P. Persson,et al.  Normal Range Growth Curves for Fetal Biparietal Diameter, Occipito Frontal Diameter, Mean Abdominal Diameters and Femur Length , 1986, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  T. Bjerkedal,et al.  Growth of the Fetal Skull, with Special Reference to Weight‐For‐Dates of the Newborn Child , 1976, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  J. Hobbins,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Fetal Head Biometry , 1984, American journal of perinatology.

[5]  E. Bertino,et al.  Longitudinal distance standards of fetal growth , 2000 .

[6]  N. Secher,et al.  NORMAL GROWTH OF THE FETAL BIPARIETAL DIAMETER AND THE ABDOMINAL DIAMETER IN A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 1985, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[7]  G. Greisen,et al.  Normal fetal growth evaluated by longitudinal ultrasound examinations. , 1990, Early human development.

[8]  P. Royston,et al.  Design and analysis of longitudinal studies of fetal size , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Pitfalls in femur length measurements. , 1987, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  H. Gjessing,et al.  Birthweight by gestational age in Norway , 2000, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[11]  A. Tverdal [Height, weight and body mass index of men and women aged 40-42 years]. , 1996, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[12]  S Campbell,et al.  GROWTH OF THE FETAL BIPARIETAL DIAMETER DURING NORMAL PREGNANCY , 1971, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[13]  P Royston,et al.  Calculation of unconditional and conditional reference intervals for foetal size and growth from longitudinal measurements. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Stuart Campbell,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements * , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Efficient statistical modelling of longitudinal data. , 1986, Annals of human biology.

[16]  S. Ogston,et al.  Conditional centiles for the quantification of fetal growth , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  D. Sahota,et al.  Customizing fetal biometric charts , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  Y. Ville,et al.  Sex‐specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[19]  T. Kiserud,et al.  Fetal age assessment based on ultrasound head biometry and the effect of maternal and fetal factors , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[20]  P. Royston,et al.  How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  P. Grøttum,et al.  A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15 000 examinations , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[22]  R. Deter,et al.  Growth standards for anatomic measurements and growth rates derived from longitudinal studies of normal fetal growth , 1992, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[23]  F. Cantraine,et al.  Normal Growth of the Abdominal Perimeter , 1984, American journal of perinatology.

[24]  J. Hobbins,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Fetal Limb Growth , 1984, American journal of perinatology.

[25]  D. Altman,et al.  Design and analysis of studies to derive charts of fetal size , 1993, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[26]  S Gallivan,et al.  An investigation of fetal growth using serial ultrasound data , 1993, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[27]  James Willocks The Use of Ultrasonic Cephalometry , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.