Pocket work for optimising outcomes in prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Implant breast reconstruction is a recommendable alternative for women who have undergone mastectomy and lack the necessary subcutaneous fat tissue for an autologous reconstruction. On the other hand, many women reject the morbidity of the donor site, prolonged recovery periods and muscular weakness associated with autologous reconstruction. Therefore, muscle and skin expansion has become one of the most popular approaches used in breast reconstruction. Nevertheless, the expansion process may be hindered by events like seroma formation, implant rotation, moving upward or downward altering the location or shape of the submammary crease, capsule contracture or extrusion. Since the advent of the anatomical expander, two-stage reconstruction with the expander/implant sequence has become the most popular choice in prosthetic breast reconstruction (PBR). The second surgical stage, in which the tissue expander is exchanged for the permanent implant, offers a unique opportunity for pocket work. Pocket work strategies and their indications should be known and applied by the surgeon who aims at optimising PBR aesthetic results.

[1]  J. J. Ryan.  A lower thoracic advancement flap in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. , 1982, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  H. Massiha.  Reconstruction of the Submammary Crease for Correction of Postoperative Deformities in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery , 2001, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  I. K. Cohen,et al.  Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expansion. , 1987, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  V. Pennisi.  MAKING A DEFINITE INFRAMAMMARY FOLD UNDER A RECONSTRUCTED BREAST , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  J. R. Lewis.  Use of a Sliding Flap from the Abdomen to Provide Cover in Breast Reconstructions , 1979, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  P. Cordeiro,et al.  Do metallic ports in tissue expanders affect postmastectomy radiation delivery? , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Traverso Lw,et al.  Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy is as safe as mastectomy alone. , 1990 .

[8]  S. S. Kroll,et al.  A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  P. Quattrone,et al.  Focus on the Breast Fascial System: A New Approach for Inframammary Fold Reconstruction , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  C Nos,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Late Cosmetic Results following Breast Reconstruction: I. Implant Reconstruction , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  G. Robb,et al.  Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  H. Massiha.  Augmentation in Ptotic and Densely Glandular Breasts: Prevention, Treatment, and Classification of Double‐bubble Deformity , 2000, Annals of Plastic Surgery.

[13]  S. Spear,et al.  Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Two Stages Using Textured, Integrated-Valve Tissue Expanders and Breast Implants , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  G. Maxwell,et al.  Eighty‐Four Consecutive Breast Reconstructions Using a Textured Silicone Tissue Expander , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  T. D. Cronin,et al.  Our experiences with the silastic gel breast prosthesis. , 1970, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  N. McLean,et al.  A review of 120 Becker permanent tissue expanders in reconstruction of the breast. , 1996, British journal of plastic surgery.

[17]  Horacio F. Mayer,et al.  Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: the ensured subpectoral pocket (ESP). , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[18]  J. Lowery,et al.  Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Two‐Year Results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.