Trends in Risks Associated With New Drug Development: Success Rates for Investigational Drugs

This study utilizes both public and private data sources to estimate clinical phase transition and clinical approval probabilities for drugs in the development pipelines of the 50 largest pharmaceutical firms (by sales). The study examined the development histories of these investigational compounds from the time point at which they first entered clinical testing (1993–2004) through June 2009. The clinical approval success rate in the United States was 16% for self‐originated drugs (originating from the pharmaceutical company itself) during both the 1993–1998 and the 1999–2004 subperiods. For all compounds (including licensed‐in and licensed‐out drugs in addition to self‐originated drugs), the clinical approval success rate for the entire study period was 19%. The estimated clinical approval success rates and phase transition probabilities differed significantly by therapeutic class. The estimated clinical approval success rate for self‐originated compounds over the entire study period was 32% for large molecules and 13% for small molecules. The estimated transition probabilities were also higher for all clinical phases with respect to large molecules.

[1]  Success rates in the United States drug development system , 1984, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  L Lasagna,et al.  Cost of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. , 1991, Journal of health economics.

[3]  L Lasagna,et al.  New drug development in the United States from 1963 to 1990 , 1991, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[4]  G. Tadmor,et al.  Biopharmaceuticals and Conventional Drugs: Clinical Success Rates , 1992, Bio/Technology.

[5]  Mark-M. Struck,et al.  Biopharmaceutical R&D Success Rates and Development Times , 1994, Bio/Technology.

[6]  J. DiMasi,et al.  Success rates for new drugs entering clinical testing in the United States , 1995, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  Research and development costs for new drugs by therapeutic category. A study of the US pharmaceutical industry. , 1995, PharmacoEconomics.

[8]  J. DiMasi,et al.  Recombinant protein and therapeutic monoclonal antibody drug development in the United States from 1980 to 1994 , 1996, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[9]  J. DiMasi New drug development in the United States from 1963 to 1999 , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[10]  J. DiMasi,et al.  Risks in new drug development: Approval success rates for investigational drugs , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[11]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[12]  R. Frank,et al.  New estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[13]  K. Kaitin,et al.  The New Drug Approvals of 1999, 2000, and 2001: Drug Development Trends a Decade after Passage of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 , 2003 .

[14]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  R&D Costs and Returns by Therapeutic Category , 2004 .

[15]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  J. DiMasi,et al.  The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: is biotech different? , 2007 .

[17]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies as innovative therapeutics. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[18]  Kenneth A Getz,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Protocol Design Changes on Clinical Trial Performance , 2008, American journal of therapeutics.

[19]  J. DiMasi The Value of Improving the Productivity of the Drug Development Process , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.