Seed size and shape are not related to persistence in soil in Australia in the same way as in Britain

1. Previous studies have shown that among British species, seeds that persist in the soil tend to be small and compact compared with non-persistent seeds. We tested whether or not this pattern is repeated among 101 Australian species, from a range of habitats. 2. Seed mass was plotted against variance of seed dimensions, across all species. Species with persistent seeds were found across the whole range of seed mass (0·217–648·9 mg) and variance (0·0000–0·2497), providing no evidence for a critical mass or variance which separated persistent from transient seeds. 3. We tested whether or not divergence within individual clades between persistent and transient seeds was associated with increased seed mass or seed dimension variance, using phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs). There was no consistent tendency found. 4. Thus for Australian species, persistent seeds were not smaller or more compact than transient seeds when compared across all species or when compared using PICs. Presumably the natural history of burial and disturbance operates differently in British and Australian habitats.

[1]  R. Whittaker.  Krakatau: the destruction and reassembly of an island ecosystem: By I.W.B. Thornton Harvard University Press, 1996. £25.50 hbk (xiii + 346 pages) ISBN 0 674 50568 9 , 1997 .

[2]  M. Westoby,et al.  Hypotheses on Seed Size: Tests Using the Semiarid Flora of Western New South Wales, Australia , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[3]  M. Rees.  Trade-offs among dispersal strategies in British plants , 1993, Nature.

[4]  Ken Thompson,et al.  Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil , 1993 .

[5]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  R. Hnatiuk.  Census of Australian vascular plants , 1990 .

[7]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species , 1989 .

[8]  T. Philippi,et al.  Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  B. F. V. Tooren.  The fate of seeds after dispersal in chalk grassland: the role of the bryophyte layer , 1988 .

[10]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Selective Interactions of Dispersal, Dormancy, and Seed Size as Adaptations for Reducing Risk in Variable Environments , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[11]  N. M. Irons,et al.  A review of information relevant to the mulga rangelands of western New South Wales , 1988 .

[12]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Comparative Plant Ecology , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[13]  M. Fenner.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SEED WEIGHT, ASH CONTENT AND SEEDLING GROWTH IN TWENTY‐FOUR SPECIES OF COMPOSITAE , 1983 .

[14]  J. Pate,et al.  The Biology of Australian plants , 1982 .

[15]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GERMINATION CHARACTERISTICS IN A LOCAL FLORA , 1981 .

[16]  J. P. Grime,et al.  SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE SEED BANKS OF HERBACEOUS SPECIES IN TEN CONTRASTING HABITATS , 1979 .

[17]  L. Ballard,et al.  The interrelation of dormancy, size, and hardness in seed of Trifolium subterraneum L. , 1964 .