Engineering Methodology for Student-Driven CubeSats

CubeSats are widely used by universities and research institutions all over the world. Their popularity is generally attributed to the use of low-cost components, free student labor and simple design. They have been shown to encourage Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) students to become involved in designing, implementing and testing a real functioning spacecraft system. Projects like this encourage students from different disciplines to team up to design and build CubeSats, providing interdisciplinary work experience. Participating students vary in their expertise in developing such systems. Some will work on the project for years while others are not willing to spend two or three consecutive semesters developing a CubeSat project. Despite their simplicity in design and low cost, CubeSats are considered great engineering systems for exploring space. Nevertheless, a large number of CubeSat projects fail due to having an unclear mission, ambiguous system requirements and a lack of documentation. Students need to have a clear vision of how to build a real CubeSat system that can be launched and that can function in space. Thus, this paper proposes engineering methodologies and tools to help students develop CubeSat systems. These tools can help students with planning, collecting, eliciting and documenting the requirements in a well-defined manner. This paper focuses on student-driven CubeSat projects designed by students and faculty members. Additionally, data is presented in this paper to identify the challenges and needs of CubeSat developers. Plans for future work are also discussed.

[1]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Extending the Student Qualitative Undertaking Involvement Risk Model , 2014 .

[2]  Abdulaziz Alanazi Methodology and Tools for Reducing CubeSat Mission Failure , 2018 .

[3]  Francois Martel,et al.  Lunar magnetic field measurements with a cubesat , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[4]  Robert Burt,et al.  DISTRIBUTED ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS IN CUBESAT APPLICATIONS , 2011 .

[5]  Romain Lucken,et al.  Systematic space debris collection using Cubesat constellation , 2017 .

[6]  Freddy Alexander Díaz González,et al.  Design of a Nanosatellite Ground Monitoring and Control Software - a Case Study , 2016 .

[7]  Diego Rodriguez,et al.  Guatemala's Remote Sensing CubeSat - Tools and Approaches to Increase the Probability of Mission Success , 2018 .

[8]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Statistical Analysis of CubeSat Mission Failure , 2018 .

[9]  Noah Weitz,et al.  Analysis of Verification and Validation Techniques for Educational CubeSat Programs , 2018 .

[10]  Martin Langer,et al.  Risk Reduction and Process Acceleration for Small Spacecraft Assembly and Testing by Rapid Prototyping , 2017 .

[11]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Evaluation of the Educational Impact of Participation Time in a Small Spacecraft Development Program , 2014 .

[12]  David Krejci,et al.  A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation , 2012 .

[13]  David Kaslow,et al.  Developing a CubeSat Model-Based System Engineering (MBSE) reference model — Interim status #2 , 2016, 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[14]  Michael Swartwout Reliving 24 Years in the next 12 Minutes: A Statistical and Personal History of University-Class Satellites , 2018 .

[15]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Toward model-based requirement engineering tool support , 2017, 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  Michael Swartwout,et al.  University-Class Satellites: From Marginal Utility to 'Disruptive' Research Platforms , 2004 .

[17]  Antonio Muñoz,et al.  A Methodology for CubeSat Mission Selection , 2016 .

[18]  Paul Ward,et al.  Structured Development for Real-Time Systems , 1986 .

[19]  M. Dabrowski THE DESIGN OF A SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR A SMALL SPACE SATELLITE , 2005 .

[20]  O. Nentvich,et al.  Terrestrial gamma-ray flashes monitor demonstrator on CubeSat , 2016, Optical Engineering + Applications.