Research on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Tractor-Trailers with a Parametric Cab Design

As tractor-trailer ownership has increased year-by-year, corresponding energy consumption and environmental issues have gradually become a heated issue. Approximately 45 percent of the total aerodynamic drag of tractor-trailers is attributed to the flow at the front surface of the cab, and the gap between the cab and trailer. Therefore, this study has taken a new approach to designing the shape of the cab inspired by the external forebody of the cheetah. A parametric design protruding cab was devised in this study; the length of the protruding part and the angle between this protruding part and the A pillar were two design variables. Computational fluid dynamics simulation was conducted to investigate the drag reduction effects of these new cab styling designs, and the proposed cab reduced the drag by a maximum of 8.49%. The flow characteristics around the whole body of the tractor-trailer baseline model and the parametric cab design vehicle model were analyzed using the velocity streamline graph to illuminate the change of the flow field and the drag-reduction mechanism of the proposed design. A vortex formed above the protruding part of the cab and it acted as a ‘vortex cushion’ to accelerate the speed of the air flow; accordingly, the positive and negative pressure distribution on the front surface of the cab and trailer also changed. The new parametric design has provided the possibility to adjust the forebody of the cab to an aerodynamically optimized shape, and these findings have offered useful information for the development of a new design method of the tractor-trailer to reduce aerodynamic drag and improve fuel economy.

[1]  Makoto Tsubokura,et al.  Numerical quantification of aerodynamic damping on pitching of vehicle-inspired bluff body , 2012 .

[2]  Masato Nakajima,et al.  Development of a New Pressure Measurement Technique and PIV to Validate CFD for the Aerodynamics of Full-scale Vehicles , 2016 .

[3]  James W. Gregory,et al.  Drag Reduction on the 25-deg Ahmed Model Using Fluidic Oscillators , 2015 .

[4]  Mario Hirz,et al.  A New Approach for the Reduction of Aerodynamic Drag of Long-Distance Transportation Vehicles , 2013 .

[5]  Marella Vamsi Krishna,et al.  Adjustable Roof Fairing for Truck Aerodynamics , 2011 .

[6]  Jeong Jae Kim,et al.  Substantial drag reduction of a tractor-trailer vehicle using gap fairings , 2017 .

[7]  Walter T. Gutierrez,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (GTS) PROJECT FOR HEAVY VEHICLE DRAG REDUCTION , 1996 .

[8]  Hoon Lee,et al.  A bio-inspired device for drag reduction on a three-dimensional model vehicle , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[9]  D. Whitfield,et al.  Computational simulation of model and full scale Class 8 trucks with drag reduction devices , 2011 .

[10]  Jeong Jae Kim,et al.  Salient drag reduction of a heavy vehicle using modified cab-roof fairings , 2017 .

[11]  Walter T. Gutierrez,et al.  Aerodynamics overview of the ground transportation systems (GTS) project for heavy vehicle drag reduction , 1996 .

[12]  W. Hucho,et al.  Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles , 1987 .

[13]  P. Patel,et al.  External Flow Analysis Over a Car to Study The Influence of Different Body Profiles Using CFD , 2001 .

[14]  Sinisa Krajnovic,et al.  The Flow around a simplified tractor-trailer model studied by large eddy simulation , 2012 .

[15]  Drew Landman,et al.  Understanding Practical Limits to Heavy Truck Drag Reduction , 2009 .

[16]  F. Menter,et al.  Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model , 2003 .

[17]  Majid Oveisi,et al.  Aerodynamic drag reduction of heavy vehicles using append devices by CFD analysis , 2015 .

[18]  James C. Ross,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles II: Trucks, Buses, and Trains , 2009 .

[19]  Firoz Alam,et al.  A study on aerodynamic drag of a semi-trailer truck , 2013 .

[20]  Konstantinos Kontis,et al.  Flow characteristics over a tractor-trailer model with and without vane-type vortex generator installed , 2016 .

[21]  Toshio Kobayashi,et al.  A Review of CFD Methods and Their Application to Automobile Aerodynamics , 1992 .

[22]  Jeong Jae Kim,et al.  Reduction of drag in heavy vehicles with two different types of advanced side skirts , 2016 .

[23]  An Yang.  Aerodynamic drag reduction of van based on underbody skirt , 2011 .

[24]  Sang Joon Lee,et al.  Drag reduction of a heavy vehicle using a modified boat tail with lower inclined air deflector , 2017, J. Vis..

[25]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[26]  Makoto Tsubokura,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of the Flow-Field around a Full-Scale Heavy-Duty Truck☆ , 2013 .

[27]  Chitrarth Lav.  Three Dimensional CFD Analysis on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of a Bluff Tractor Trailer Body using Vortex Generators , 2013 .

[28]  Jeong Jae Kim,et al.  Bio-inspired cab-roof fairing of heavy vehicles for enhancing drag reduction and driving stability , 2017 .

[29]  William F. Milliken,et al.  Race Car Vehicle Dynamics , 1994 .

[30]  Kevin R. Cooper,et al.  Truck Aerodynamics Reborn - Lessons from the Past , 2003 .

[31]  Luis Castejon,et al.  Aerodynamic analysis of some boat tails for heavy vehicles , 2012 .

[32]  Kevin R. Cooper.  Wind Tunnel and Track Tests of Class 8 Tractors Pulling Single and Tandem Trailers Fitted with Side Skirts and Boat-tails , 2012 .