Retrospective heel effect correction in conventional radiography

Three methods for retrospective correction of intensity inhomogeneities in diagnostic digital X-ray images are presented. The first method fits a theoretical heel effect model to the background intensities. The second method optimizes the parameters of a chosen image formation model to maximize the likelihood of the background pixels of the acquired image, under the assumption that their intensity values are Gaussian distributed. Additive and multiplicative linear image formation models with different degrees of freedom are fitted onto a subset of the background pixels discarding the pixels with the largest residual errors to eliminate outliers. The third method minimizes the entropy of the background and diagnostic region of the image, excluding the collimation areas. Six image formation models, using a combination of smoothly varying basis functions, are quantitatively evaluated and compared with the first method on a number of reference and real diagnostic X-ray images.

[1]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[2]  G K Manos,et al.  Segmenting radiographs of the hand and wrist. , 1994, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[3]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Petia Radeva,et al.  A snake for model-based segmentation , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes , 1981, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Viergever,et al.  Retrospective shading correction based on entropy minimization , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  S L Fritz,et al.  A comparison of computed and measured heel effect for various target angles. , 1982, Medical physics.

[8]  L T Niklason,et al.  Automated segmentation of regions of interest on hand radiographs. , 1994, Medical physics.

[9]  G Coppini,et al.  Automatic analysis of hand radiographs for the assessment of skeletal age: a subsymbolic approach. , 1995, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[10]  H. K. Huang,et al.  Computer-assisted bone age assessment: image preprocessing and epiphyseal/metaphyseal ROI extraction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Robust Regression and Outlier Detection , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[12]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Retrospective correction of the heel effect in hand radiographs , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[14]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[15]  David Sinclair,et al.  Automatic segmentation of hand-wrist radiographs , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[16]  Jack Sklansky,et al.  Finding circles by an array of accumulators , 1975, Commun. ACM.

[17]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Evaluation of image features and search strategies for segmentation of bone structures in radiographs using Active Shape Models , 2002, Medical Image Anal..