Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts

When a word is preceded by a supportive context such as a semantically associated word or a strongly constraining sentence frame, the N400 component of the ERP is reduced in amplitude. An ongoing debate is the degree to which this reduction reflects a passive spread of activation across long-term semantic memory representations as opposed to specific predictions about upcoming input. We addressed this question by embedding semantically associated prime–target pairs within an experimental context that encouraged prediction to a greater or lesser degree. The proportion of related items was used to manipulate the predictive validity of the prime for the target while holding semantic association constant. A semantic category probe detection task was used to encourage semantic processing and to preclude the need for a motor response on the trials of interest. A larger N400 reduction to associated targets was observed in the high than the low relatedness proportion condition, consistent with the hypothesis that predictions about upcoming stimuli make a substantial contribution to the N400 effect. We also observed an earlier priming effect (205–240 msec) in the high-proportion condition, which may reflect facilitation because of form-based prediction. In summary, the results suggest that predictability modulates N400 amplitude to a greater degree than the semantic content of the context.

[1]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Are vowels and consonants processed differently? ERP evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. , 2009 .

[2]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[3]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[5]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Auditory and visual semantic priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: an event-related brain potential study. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Matthew J. Traxler,et al.  Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  The contributions of lexico-semantic and discourse information to the resolution of ambiguous categorical anaphors , 2007 .

[8]  P. Gordon,et al.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[9]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension , 2010, Brain and Language.

[12]  Jos J. A. Van Berkum,et al.  What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect , 2007, Brain Research.

[13]  Gary L. Dannenbring,et al.  Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[16]  D Deacon,et al.  The lifetime of automatic semantic priming effects may exceed two seconds. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Suzanne Dikker,et al.  Predicting and Parsing Language in Time and Space , 2010 .

[18]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[20]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[21]  C. Petten Examining the N400 semantic context effect item-by-item: relationship to corpus-based measures of word co-occurrence. , 2014 .

[22]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[23]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  C. Petten,et al.  A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation , 2007, Brain Research.

[25]  J. Grainger,et al.  The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Gina R Kuperberg,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of indirect semantic priming. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Jos J. A. Van Berkum,et al.  Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? , 2009, Brain Research.

[28]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Working Memory Capacity Dissociates Lexical and Sentential Context Effects , 1997 .

[29]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[30]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[31]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[32]  R. West,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Yufang Yang,et al.  Acquiring concepts and features of novel words by two types of learning: direct mapping and inference , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Processing classifier–noun agreement in a long distance: An ERP study on Mandarin Chinese , 2014, Brain and Language.

[38]  G. McKoon,et al.  The readiness is all: The functionality of memory‐based text processing , 1998 .

[39]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[40]  C. Petten,et al.  Prospective and retrospective semantic processing: Prediction, time, and relationship strength in event-related potentials , 2014, Brain and Language.

[41]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[42]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. Kutas Event related brain potential studies of language , 1988 .

[44]  Jason Bohan,et al.  Anomalies at the Borderline of Awareness: An ERP Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  C. Petten A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .

[46]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Milena Rabovsky,et al.  Simulating the N400 ERP component as semantic network error: Insights from a feature-based connectionist attractor model of word meaning , 2014, Cognition.

[49]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[50]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[51]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Are Vowels and Consonants Processed Differently? Event-related Potential Evidence with a Delayed Letter Paradigm , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  C. Clifton,et al.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Basic Processes in Reading , 2013 .

[55]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  Predictive Mechanisms in Idiom Comprehension , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  Laurel Brehm,et al.  The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[57]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[58]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[59]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  H. Kolk,et al.  Mediated Priming in the Lexical Decision Task: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials and Reaction Time , 2000 .

[61]  M. Kutas,et al.  Getting it: human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[62]  Line Burholt Kristensen,et al.  Context Predicts Word Order Processing in Broca's Region , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[64]  Heather J Ferguson,et al.  Empathy predicts false belief reasoning ability: evidence from the N400. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[65]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Pre-Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Sensitivity to Likely Upcoming Meaning and Structure , 2014, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[66]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  Martin Paczynski,et al.  Establishing Causal Coherence across Sentences: An ERP Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  M. Kutas,et al.  Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  William M. Perlstein,et al.  Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  M. Traxler,et al.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence , 2015, Cognition.

[71]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[73]  Peter C Gordon,et al.  Does discourse congruence influence spoken language comprehension before lexical association? Evidence from event-related potentials , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[74]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Alpha and theta brain oscillations index dissociable processes in spoken word recognition , 2014, NeuroImage.

[75]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[76]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  So that's what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[77]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Working Memory and the Establishment of Filler-Gap Dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[78]  C. A. Becker Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[79]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[80]  Marte Otten,et al.  Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? , 2008 .

[81]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming modulates the N400, N300, and N400RP , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[82]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[83]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[84]  Van Berkum,et al.  The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review , 2009 .

[85]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  With great expectations, can two "wrongs" prime a "right"? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[86]  P. Holcomb Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.

[87]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Visual Word Priming Effects , 2000, Brain and Language.

[88]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[89]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[90]  Kara D. Federmeier Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[91]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[92]  Annette M. B. de Groot Primed Lexical Decision: Combined Effects of the Proportion of Related Prime-Target Pairs and the Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target , 1984 .

[93]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[94]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Priming in Sentence Processing: Intralexical Spreading Activation, Schemas, and Situation Models , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[95]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The Mechanism Underlying Backward Priming in a Lexical Decision Task: Spreading Activation versus Semantic Matching , 1998 .

[96]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception , 2010, Brain Research.

[97]  Albert Kim,et al.  Rapid Interactions between Lexical Semantic and Word Form Analysis during Word Recognition in Context: Evidence from ERPs , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[98]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[99]  M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[100]  H. Kolk,et al.  Three-step priming in lexical decision , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[101]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do , 2013 .

[102]  M. Cermolacce,et al.  “All that glitters is not … alone”. Congruity effects in highly and less predictable sentence contexts , 2014, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[103]  G. Kuperberg,et al.  Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[104]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[105]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Primed Lexical Decision: Combined Effects of the Proportion of Related Prime-Target Pairs and the Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target , 1984 .

[106]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[107]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle , 2008, Psychological science.

[108]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[109]  Giordana Grossi Relatedness proportion effects on masked associative priming: an ERP study. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[110]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[111]  M. Kiefer The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.