A Minimal Moral Hazard Central Stabilisation Capacity for the EMU Based on World Trade

Recent debate has focused on the introduction of a central stabilisation capacity as a completing element of the Economic and Monetary Union. Its main objective would be to contribute cushioning country-specific economic shocks, especially when national fiscal stabilisers are run down. There are two main potential objections to such schemes proposed so far: first, they may lead to moral hazard, i.e. weaken the incentives for sound fiscal policies and structural reforms. Second, they may generate permanent transfers among countries. Here we present a scheme that is relatively free from moral hazard, because the transfers are based on changes in world trade in the various sectors. These changes can be considered as largely exogenous, hence independent from an individual government's policy; therefore, the scheme is better protected against manipulation. Our scheme works as follows: if a sector is hit by a bad shock at the world market level, then a country with an economic structure that is skewed towards this sector receives a (one-time) transfer from the other countries. The scheme is designed such that the transfers add up to zero each period, hence obviating the need for a borrowing capacity. We show that the transfers generated by our scheme tend to be countercyclical and larger when economies are less diversified. Cumulated over time, a country's transfers generally tend to stabilise and to move towards zero, thus suggesting that permanent transfers are inherently ruled out under this scheme. Finally, we show that transfers are quite robust to revisions in the underlying export data.

[1]  M. Beblavý,et al.  Feasibility and Added Value of a European Unemployment Benefits Scheme , 2017 .

[2]  Valentina Milano Risk Sharing in the Euro Zone: the Role of European Institutions , 2017 .

[3]  C. Cottarelli,et al.  The Role of Fiscal Transfers in Smoothing Regional Shocks: Evidence from Existing Federations , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  P. Steinberg,et al.  8. Wirtschaftspolitik neu denken – ein besserer Fiskalrahmen für die Eurozone , 2016, Die Zukunft der Eurozone.

[5]  O. J. Erdélyi Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union , 2016 .

[6]  R. Tamborini,et al.  "Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union" , 2015 .

[7]  C. Fuest,et al.  An unemployment insurance scheme for the euro area? A comparison of different alternatives using microdata , 2014, International Tax and Public Finance.

[8]  John C. Bluedorn,et al.  Toward A Fiscal Union for the Euro Area , 2013 .

[9]  D. Furceri,et al.  The Euro Area Crisis: Need for a Supranational Fiscal Risk Sharing Mechanism? , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  I. Werning,et al.  Fiscal Unions , 2012 .

[11]  S. Basher,et al.  Channels of risk-sharing among Canadian provinces: 1961–2006 , 2012 .

[12]  Ralf Hepp,et al.  Interstate Risk Sharing in Germany: 1970-2006 , 2011 .

[13]  A. Bakker A fiscal insurance for the EMU , 1999 .

[14]  P. Grauwe Monetary policy in Euroland , 1999 .

[15]  A. Bovenberg,et al.  The Optimality of a Monetary Union without a Fiscal Union. , 1998 .

[16]  Bent E. Sørensen,et al.  International Risk Sharing and European Monetary Unification , 1998 .

[17]  J. Hagen,et al.  Regional Insurance Against Asymmetric Shocks. An Empirical Study for the European Community , 1998 .

[18]  M. Obstfeld,et al.  Regional non-adjustment and fiscal policy , 1998 .

[19]  Bent E. Sørensen,et al.  Channels of Interstate Risk Sharing: United States 1963–1990 , 1996 .

[20]  T. Padoa-Schioppa Efficiency, Stability, and Equity: A Strategy for the Evolution of the Economic System of the European Community , 1988 .