Application of Optimization-Based Worst Case Analysis to Control Law Assessment in Aerospace

The flight control law design assessment problem can be formulated as a robustness analysis problem, where a set of suitably defined assessment criteria must be checked to lie within certain limits for all admissible variations of vehicle parameters, external inputs and all flight conditions. Optimization based worst case analysis can be used to find those parameters/inputs/flight conditions for which the criteria are violated or poorly satisfied. The potential of this approach is its general applicability to any kind of simulation models and scenarios including complex non-linearity in control laws. But in order to confidently assert that no violation of assessment criteria exists, a global optimization problem has to be solved. Especially in case of many assessment criteria, global worst case search can lead to a huge computational effort. However, solving worst case problems as a multi-objective problem can help to reduce the number of computations since all or some of the assessment criteria can be considered simultaneously. Optimization-based approaches can also be used to detect parameter sensitivities on the assessment criteria and can help to find safe parameter regions.

[1]  Andras Varga,et al.  Advanced techniques for clearance of flight control laws , 2002 .

[2]  Andras Varga Optimisation-Based Clearance , 2002 .

[3]  Lars Forssell,et al.  Flight Clearance Analysis Using Global Nonlinear Optimisation-Based Search Algorithms , 2003 .

[4]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms with Sharing for Multimodalfunction Optimization , 1987, ICGA.

[5]  Andreas Varga,et al.  Optimization Based Clearance of Flight Control Laws , 2012 .

[6]  Harald Pfifer,et al.  Robust Flight Control System Design Verification and Validation by Multiobjective Worst-case Search , 2012 .

[7]  W. Ames Mathematics in Science and Engineering , 1999 .

[8]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Nonlinear robustness analysis of flight control laws for highly augmented aircraft , 2007 .

[9]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Optimisation-Based Flight Control Law Clearance , 2007 .

[11]  Hans-Dieter Joos,et al.  A Fault Diagnosis Based Reconfigurable Longitudinal Control System for Managing Loss of Air Data Sensors for a Civil Aircraft , 2014 .

[12]  Hans-Dieter Joos,et al.  The V&V problematic for launchers: current practise and potential advantages on the application of modern analysis techniques , 2011 .

[13]  Hirotaka Nakayama,et al.  Theory of Multiobjective Optimization , 1985 .

[14]  Hans-Dieter Joos Worst-Case Parameter Search Based Clearance Using Parallel Nonlinear Programming Methods , 2012 .

[15]  Jongrae Kim,et al.  Clearance of Nonlinear Flight Control Laws Using Hybrid Evolutionary Optimization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..