Apparent Ultra-High $b$-Value Diffusion-Weighted Image Reconstruction via Hidden Conditional Random Fields

A promising, recently explored, alternative to ultra-high b-value diffusion weighted imaging (UHB-DWI) is apparent ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted image reconstruction (AUHB-DWR), where a computational model is used to assist in the reconstruction of apparent DW images at ultra-high b-values. Firstly, we present a novel approach to AUHB-DWR that aims to improve image quality. We formulate the reconstruction of an apparent DW image as a hidden conditional random field (HCRF) in which tissue model diffusion parameters act as hidden states in this random field. The second contribution of this paper is a new generation of fully connected conditional random fields, called the hidden stochastically fully connected conditional random fields (HSFCRF) that allows for efficient inference with significantly reduced computational complexity via stochastic clique structures. The proposed AUHB-DWR algorithms, HCRF and HSFCRF, are evaluated quantitatively in nine different patient cases using Fisher's criteria, probability of error, and coefficient of variation metrics to validate its effectiveness for the purpose of improving intensity delineation between expert identified suspected cancerous and healthy tissue within the prostate gland. The proposed methods are also examined using a prostate phantom, where the apparent ultra-high b-value DW images reconstructed using the tested AUHB-DWR methods are compared with real captured UHB-DWI. The results illustrate that the proposed AUHB-DWR methods has improved reconstruction quality and improved intensity delineation compared with existing AUHB-DWR approaches.

[1]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Reliable Assessment of Perfusivity and Diffusivity from Diffusion Imaging of the Body , 2012, MICCAI.

[2]  Andrew Adams,et al.  Fast High‐Dimensional Filtering Using the Permutohedral Lattice , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Koichi Oshio,et al.  Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. , 2006, European urology.

[5]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Urology.

[6]  Fernando Pereira,et al.  Shallow Parsing with Conditional Random Fields , 2003, NAACL.

[7]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Hidden Conditional Random Fields for Gesture Recognition , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[8]  Irina Rish,et al.  An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier , 2001 .

[9]  D. Collins,et al.  Computed diffusion-weighted MR imaging may improve tumor detection. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  Martial Hebert,et al.  A hierarchical field framework for unified context-based classification , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[11]  Chi-Hoon Lee,et al.  Segmenting Brain Tumors Using Pseudo-Conditional Random Fields , 2008, MICCAI.

[12]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Objects in Context , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[13]  M. Orton,et al.  Robust estimation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in heterogeneous solid tumors , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  A Multi-Parametric Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Texture Feature Model for Prostate Cancer Analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Michel Galley,et al.  A Skip-Chain Conditional Random Field for Ranking Meeting Utterances by Importance , 2006, EMNLP.

[16]  Pushmeet Kohli,et al.  Robust Higher Order Potentials for Enforcing Label Consistency , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  D. Collins,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion in body diffusion-weighted MRI: reality and challenges. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Hanna M. Wallach,et al.  Conditional Random Fields: An Introduction , 2004 .

[19]  Biing-Hwang Juang,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for Speech Recognition , 1991 .

[20]  Bo Wang,et al.  Coefficient of Variation, Signal-to-Noise Ratio, and Effects of Normalization in Validation of Biomarkers from NMR-based Metabonomics Studies. , 2013, Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society.

[21]  T. Sone,et al.  High b Value (2,000 s/mm2) Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer at 3 Tesla: Comparison with 1,000 s/mm2 for Tumor Conspicuity and Discrimination of Aggressiveness , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  T. Scheenen,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Computed High b Value Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[23]  K. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Endorectal diffusion‐weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Prostate Cancer Localization With Multispectral MRI Using Cost-Sensitive Support Vector Machines and Conditional Random Fields , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[25]  Vladlen Koltun,et al.  Efficient Inference in Fully Connected CRFs with Gaussian Edge Potentials , 2011, NIPS.

[26]  David Atkinson,et al.  Microstructural characterisation of normal and malignant human prostate tissue with VERDICT-MRI , 2014 .

[27]  Jan Kautz,et al.  Fully-Connected CRFs with Non-Parametric Pairwise Potential , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[28]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Comparison of MRI with CT for the radiotherapy planning of prostate cancer: a feasibility study. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[30]  H. Wijkstra,et al.  Correlation of transrectal ultrasound, computer analysis of transrectal ultrasound and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimen , 2001, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[31]  Miguel Á. Carreira-Perpiñán,et al.  Multiscale conditional random fields for image labeling , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[32]  Paul W. Fieguth,et al.  Efficient Bayesian inference using fully connected conditional random fields with stochastic cliques , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[33]  Paul Fieguth,et al.  Statistical Image Processing and Multidimensional Modeling , 2010 .

[34]  C. Kim,et al.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  Gary Liney,et al.  Correlation of diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance data with cellularity in prostate cancer , 2009, BJU international.

[36]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  Efficient inference for fully-connected CRFs with stationarity , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[37]  A. Elster,et al.  Acute cerebral infarction: quantification of spin-density and T2 shine-through phenomena on diffusion-weighted MR images. , 1999, Radiology.

[38]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[39]  P. Scardino,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[40]  Patrick C. Walsh,et al.  Prevalence of Prostate Cancer Among Men With a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per Milliliter , 2004 .

[41]  Qun Chen,et al.  Optimization of b‐value sampling for diffusion‐weighted imaging of the kidney , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[43]  V. Khoo,et al.  Radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[44]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Noise estimation and removal in MR imaging: The variance-stabilization approach , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[45]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Quantitative investigative analysis of tumour separability in the prostate gland using ultra-high b-value computed diffusion imaging , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[46]  T. Metens,et al.  What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T? , 2012, European Radiology.

[47]  Hai Zhao,et al.  Effective Tag Set Selection in Chinese Word Segmentation via Conditional Random Field Modeling , 2006, PACLIC.

[48]  A R Padhani,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI: a new functional clinical technique for tumour imaging. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[49]  Daniel C Alexander,et al.  Noninvasive quantification of solid tumor microstructure using VERDICT MRI. , 2014, Cancer research.

[50]  N. deSouza,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER : VALUE OF APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS FOR IDENTIFYING MALIGNANT NODULES , 2010 .

[51]  Ramón Ribes,et al.  Diffusion MRI outside the brain , 2012 .

[52]  David A. Clausi,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction of Breast MRI Using Homotopic $L_0$ Minimization in a Regional Sparsified Domain , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[53]  J. Crowley,et al.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[54]  Alexander Wong,et al.  Homotopic, non-local sparse reconstruction of optical coherence tomography imagery. , 2012, Optics express.

[55]  Andrew B. Rosenkrantz 4 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate , 2017 .

[56]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparative Study of Energy Minimization Methods for Markov Random Fields , 2006, ECCV.

[57]  E Bellon,et al.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[58]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Markov Random Field Texture Models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[59]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[60]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data , 2001, ICML.

[61]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[62]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Correlated diffusion imaging , 2013, BMC Medical Imaging.

[63]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[64]  D. Alexander,et al.  Information theoretic ranking of four models of diffusion attenuation in fresh and fixed prostate tissue ex vivo , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.