Vibration suppression on a platform by using vibration isolation and mitigation devices

A new kind of vibration isolation and mitigation device with high damping is designed and fabricated for reducing dynamic responses of a platform under the excitation with wide frequency range. Tests are carried out to consider the influence of the frequency and amplitude of excitation on the properties of the device. The dynamic model of the platform incorporating with the vibration isolation and mitigation devices is established, and dynamic responses of the mitigated platform are calculated under different excitations. It can be shown from comparison between responses of the mitigated and unmitigated structures in time domain and frequency domain that the devices can significantly reduce dynamic responses of the platform.

[1]  D. Kamesh,et al.  Modeling, design and analysis of low frequency platform for attenuating micro-vibration in spacecraft , 2010 .

[2]  J. H. Wu,et al.  Reference adjustment for a high-acceleration and high-precision platform via A-type of iterative learning control , 2007 .

[3]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Adaptive control of flow-induced oscillations including vortex effects , 1999 .

[4]  Dong Zhao,et al.  Study on the anti-vibration devices for a model jacket platform , 2010 .

[5]  Kuan-Wen Chen,et al.  Intelligent active vibration control in an isolation platform , 2008 .

[6]  Bao-Lin Zhang,et al.  Pure delayed non-fragile control for offshore steel jacket platforms subject to non-linear self-excited wave force , 2014 .

[7]  Qianjin Yue,et al.  Ice-induced non-structure vibration reduction of jacket platforms with isolation cone system , 2013 .

[8]  Zhao-Dong Xu,et al.  Optimization analysis on parameters of multi-dimensional earthquake isolation and mitigation device based on genetic algorithm , 2013 .

[9]  Zhao-Dong Xu,et al.  Experimental study on vertical performance of multidimensional earthquake isolation and mitigation devices for long-span reticulated structures , 2012 .

[10]  Zichen Chen,et al.  Active vibration isolation of a micro-manufacturing platform based on a neural network , 2002 .

[11]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Hybrid platform for high‐tech equipment protection against earthquake and microvibration , 2006 .

[12]  K. V. Avramov,et al.  Snap-through truss as an absorber of forced oscillations , 2006 .

[13]  Claude-Henri Lamarque,et al.  Nonlinear energy pumping under transient forcing with strongly nonlinear coupling: Theoretical and experimental results , 2007 .

[14]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  Vibration control of steel jacket offshore platform structures with damping isolation systems , 2007 .

[15]  A A Golafshani,et al.  Friction damper for vibration control in offshore steel jacket platforms , 2009 .

[16]  Qiao Jin,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on tuned liquid dampers for controlling earthquake response of jacket offshore platform , 2007 .

[17]  Jia Sheng Yang.  Robust mixed $$H_2 /H_\infty $$H2/H∞ active control for offshore steel jacket platform , 2014 .

[18]  Zhao-Dong Xu,et al.  Model, tests and application design for viscoelastic dampers , 2011 .

[19]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Seismic performance of structures connected by viscoelastic dampers , 2006 .

[20]  Roman Lewandowski,et al.  Dynamic analysis of frames with viscoelastic dampers modelled by rheological models with fractionalderivatives , 2011 .

[21]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Vibration tests of 5-storey steel frame with viscoelastic dampers , 2004 .

[22]  Claude-Henri Lamarque,et al.  Contribution to efficiency of irreversible passive energy pumping with a strong nonlinear attachment , 2007 .