Equity and Fairness Norms in Sociotechnical Systems: Emerging Perspectives for Design

Equity and fairness are important socially relevant issues that are rarely considered or quantitatively studied in engineering systems analysis and technical design. Sociotechnical systems that provide important services, such as water supply, energ supply, transportation services, and telecommunication services, are largely designed using measures of technical performance and cost. Given the vital links of these systems to social welfare, it is important that techno-economic criteria (for guiding design) are augmented with socially important considerations such as equity and fairness. Here, an initial conceptual framework and some quantitative measures of equity are presented. An irrigation network is discussed as an application case. Statistical variation of its normalized performance (ratios of actual versus planned service) across spatially separated parts of the system, and spatial variation of reliability are used as measures of equity. The irrigation system exhibited median reliability of 84% over a decade, however, system equity had little to no improvement. The influence of a network’s architecture on evolution of degrees of fairness is discussed, and simulations-based analyses show relationship between network structure and variation of fairness norms. The cases show that inclusion of equity measures in design and operations optimization can be formalized, and equity in resource allocation resulting from emergent behavior can be impacted via promoting and steering collective fairness norms.

[1]  J. Gupta,et al.  Towards an Elaborated Theory of Inclusive Development , 2015, The European Journal of Development Research.

[2]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Efficient and equitable spatial allocation of renewable power plants at the country scale , 2017, Nature Energy.

[3]  R. Boyd,et al.  In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small- Scale Societies , 2001 .

[4]  T. Killingback,et al.  Spatial Ultimatum Games, collaborations and the evolution of fairness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  R. Thaler The Ultimatum Game , 1988 .

[6]  Abubakr Muhammad,et al.  Socio-hydrological assessment of water security in canal irrigation systems: A conjoint quantitative analysis of equity and reliability , 2018, Water Security.

[7]  J. Henrich,et al.  Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment , 2010, Science.

[8]  M. Rabin Published by: American , 2022 .

[9]  Afreen Siddiqi,et al.  Sociotechnical systems and sustainability: current and future perspectives for inclusive development , 2017 .

[10]  Rajan K. Sampath,et al.  Equity Measures for Irrigation Performance Evaluation , 1988 .

[11]  M. Nowak,et al.  The spatial ultimatum game , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Kai Lamertz,et al.  The social construction of fairness: social influence and sense making in organizations , 2002 .

[13]  A. Oswald,et al.  Satisfaction and comparison income , 1996 .

[14]  M. Mandell Modelling effectiveness-equity trade-offs in public service delivery systems , 1991 .

[15]  Timothy K. Gates,et al.  Performance Measures for Evaluation of Irrigation‐Water‐Delivery Systems , 1990 .

[16]  Afreen Siddiqi,et al.  Socio‐Hydrology of Channel Flows in Complex River Basins: Rivers, Canals, and Distributaries in Punjab, Pakistan , 2018 .

[17]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics , 1986 .

[18]  Z. Haq,et al.  Equity in a tertiary canal of the Indus Basin Irrigation System (IBIS) , 2016 .

[19]  Duncan S. Callaway,et al.  Power quality and modern energy for all , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Babak Heydari,et al.  From Modular to Distributed Open Architectures: A Unified Decision Framework , 2016, Syst. Eng..

[21]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-Income Consumers , 2013 .

[22]  Richard Heeks,et al.  New models of inclusive innovation for development , 2014 .

[23]  D. Champernowne A Comparison of Measures of Inequality of Income Distribution , 1974 .

[24]  Deborah E. Rupp,et al.  Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level , 2002 .

[25]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being , 2004 .

[26]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Integrating Social Equity into Urban Transportation Planning: A Critical Evaluation of Equity Objectives and Measures in Transportation Plans in North America , 2015 .

[27]  K. Fliessbach,et al.  Social Comparison Affects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human Ventral Striatum , 2007, Science.

[28]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Effect of infrastructure design on commons dilemmas in social−ecological system dynamics , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Z. Ul Haq,et al.  An old–new measure of canal water inequity , 2013 .

[30]  David G. Hendry,et al.  Value Sensitive Design , 2019 .

[31]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[32]  S. L. Lissel,et al.  Status syndrome. , 2006, JAMA.

[33]  Babak Heydari,et al.  Fair Topologies: Community Structures and Network Hubs Drive Emergence of Fairness Norms , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[34]  J. Bendul,et al.  Business models for sustainable innovation - an empirical analysis of frugal products and services , 2017 .