Patient access to radiology reports: what do physicians think?

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to seek physicians' perspectives on radiology reporting systems, so that reporting systems can begin to be reorganized and made more patient centered by giving patients greater access to their personal health information. METHODS Focus-group methodology was used to explore physicians' views on direct patient access to radiologic test results. Subjects for the two groups were physicians at a single academic medical center. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS Most participants were dissatisfied with current reporting systems. Both radiologists and referring physicians (RPs) were aware that patients are not satisfied with the current system for notification of radiologic test results, and both thought that patients should have access to personal health information and take responsibility for their own health care. Regarding direct patient online access to results, both radiologists and RPs were concerned that patients would not understand report contents and that such access would lead to greater patient anxiety and demands on RPs' time. Referring physicians were also concerned that direct patient access to results would cause RPs to lose some control in the patient-physician relationship. Both radiologists and RPs preferred that any system for direct patient access incorporate a time delay and be tested for effect before being implemented. CONCLUSIONS Revisions attempting to increase the patient-centeredness of care in the area of radiology reporting should be developed and tested to 1) minimize adverse effects on patient anxiety; 2) optimize timing, considering effects on both patients and RPs; and 3) simultaneously address problems with between-physician reporting methods.

[1]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Focus Groups: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[2]  F. Stadil,et al.  Cancer. A prospective study of patients' opinion and reaction to information about cancer diagnosis. , 1980, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[3]  M. Schreiber Direct disclosure by radiologists of imaging findings to patients: a survey of radiologists and medical staff members. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  Autonomous regulation and long-term medication adherence in adult outpatients. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  R. Ryan,et al.  Initial motivations for alcohol treatment: relations with patient characteristics, treatment involvement, and dropout. , 1995, Addictive behaviors.

[6]  Annette M. O'Connor,et al.  Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[7]  M. Yelland What do patients really want? , 2011, Healthcare forum.

[8]  E H Wagner,et al.  Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[9]  D. Morgan Focus Groups As A Qualitative Method , 1997 .

[10]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[11]  G. Rowe,et al.  What do patients really want? Patients’ preferences for treatment for angina , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[12]  E. Wagner,et al.  Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[13]  R. McKendry,et al.  Challenges in family practice related to informed and shared decision-making: a survey of preceptors of medical students. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[14]  John E. Ware,et al.  Expanding Patient Involvement in Care , 1985 .

[15]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[17]  A. Elster Insight From Patients for Radiologists: Improving Our Reporting Systems , 2010 .

[18]  E. Deci,et al.  Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[19]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Youngmee Kim,et al.  Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J. Ryan,et al.  The contingency of patient preferences for involvement in health decision making. , 2007, Health care management review.

[23]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  A. J. Johnson,et al.  Web-based results distribution: new channels of communication from radiologists to patients. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[25]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[26]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  K C Carriere,et al.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. , 1997, JAMA.