Upper Extremity Vein Graft Monitoring Device after Surgery Procedure: A Preliminary Study

In most cases, surgical vein bypass or interposition vein grafting was used in both primary management of crush-avulsion amputations and on intervention for rehabilitating the patency of occluded arteries via microvascular surgery. However, surgical revascularization has significant shortcomings, principal among which is the high rate of accelerated thrombosis that develops in arterialised vein graft which renders the vein graft susceptible to acute occlusion and eventually give rise to graft failure. Evaluaion and detection of vein graft failure is essential as that will be the starting point for the clinician to make the diagnosis and safeguard patency of implanted vein graft which would otherwise fail. Unfortunately, most of the available diagnostic and monitoring tools available in the market are expensive, hence not all the hospital, private clinic and others medical centers that fully-equipped with these type of equipments. The objective of this study is to design and develop a low-cost and non-invasive vein graft monitoring prototype that able to provide high accuracy in predicting the vein graft patency and meanwhile providing the short-term monitoring on vein graft right after surgery procedure. Impedance plethysmography (IPG) was employed to measure pulsatile changes in longitudinal impedace to quantify arterial blood flow and pulsatile blood volume. Tetra-polar electrode measurement system was implemented by introduce a constant 1-mA AC current (I) at frequency of 100 kHz in the two outer electrodes. The voltage (V) is measured between the two inner electrodes, and the resulting impedance (Z) is calculated using Ohm’s Law. Arterial blood flow and pulsatile blood volume can then be estimated using impedance related volume conduction equation. By measuring the changes in electrical bioimpedance which can be used to derive important hemodynamic variables, it allows the postoperative graft surveillance and early detection atherosclerosis and thrombosis as well as estimate its severity that leads to the vein graft failure.

[1]  W. Tennant,et al.  Impedance analysis to identify the at risk femorodistal graft. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  G. Stone,et al.  Saphenous vein graft intervention. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  K. Ouriel Noninvasive diagnosis of upper extremity vascular disease. , 1998, Seminars in vascular surgery.

[4]  JosephLoscalzo Vascular Matrix and Vein Graft Failure , 2000 .

[5]  Zhongyu Li,et al.  Post-traumatic ulnar artery thrombosis: outcome of arterial reconstruction using reverse interpositional vein grafting at 2 years minimum follow-up. , 2008, The Journal of hand surgery.

[6]  A. Clowes,et al.  Secondary femoropopliteal reconstruction. , 1981, Annals of surgery.

[7]  G. Dumanian,et al.  Treatment of chronic digital ischemia with direct microsurgical revascularization. , 2007, The Journal of hand surgery.

[8]  J. Loscalzo Vascular matrix and vein graft failure. Is the message in the medium? , 2000, Circulation.

[9]  G. Moneta,et al.  Noninvasive Diagnosis of Upper Extremity Vascular Disease , 2007 .

[10]  H. Piza-Katzer,et al.  Analysis of complications in digital vein grafts , 1979, Chirurgia plastica.

[11]  S. A. Bakar,et al.  Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the effect of kink conduit in microvascular vein grafting , 2012 .

[12]  J. Cobbett Free digital transfer. Report of a case of transfer of a great toe to replace an amputated thumb. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  A. Davies,et al.  Impedance analysis versus colour Duplex in femorodistal vein graft surveillance. , 1993, European Journal of Vascular Surgery.

[14]  M. Kasdan,et al.  Vascular injuries of the upper extremity. , 1966, The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association.