Pros and cons of organ shielding for CT imaging

With the increased importance of CT radiation dose to health care providers, patients and the general public, there is an increased responsibility to minimize patient dose effectively. Bismuth shields offer a simple strategy to reduce dose to certain anterior radiosensitive organs such as breasts and eyes. However, in order to reduce organ dose they must be used properly; improper use can lead to an actual increase in the patient dose. They also create a proportional increase in image noise in the section of the body adjacent to the shield and further reduce the quantitative precision of CT numbers. In addition, shielding can degrade the overall efficiency (by an order of approximately 10%) of the imaging process, reducing the theoretical image quality that can be expected from a certain level of patient dose. However, in spite of their significant disadvantages, there are certain clinical situations and practice considerations that provide qualified justification for their continued use.

[1]  D. Frush,et al.  MOSFET dosimetry for radiation dose assessment of bismuth shielding of the eye in children. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  D. Fladeland,et al.  Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT. , 2008, Radiology.

[3]  Saint Louis,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine , 2014 .

[4]  Donald P Frush,et al.  In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J. Geleijns,et al.  Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality , 2006, European Radiology.

[6]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  W. Paul Segars,et al.  Determining organ dose: the holy grail , 2014, Pediatric Radiology.

[8]  Mannudeep K. Kalra,et al.  In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance , 2009, Korean journal of radiology.

[9]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current. , 2011, Medical physics.

[10]  M. Lungren,et al.  Radiation dose estimations to the thorax using organ-based dose modulation. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  R W Günther,et al.  Radiation dose reduction to breast and thyroid during MDCT: effectiveness of an in-plane bismuth shield , 2006, Acta radiologica.

[12]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[13]  K. Hopper,et al.  The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT--shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. , 1997, Radiology.

[14]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: a comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations , 2008, European Radiology.

[15]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[17]  R. Vetter ICRP Publication 103, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 2008 .