Outcome of hospitalized injured patients after institution of a trauma system in an urban area.

OBJECTIVE To determine if risk of death for hospitalized injured patients changes when an urban trauma system is implemented. DESIGN An analysis of the risk of death in hospitalized injured patients in 1984 and 1985 (pretrauma system), 1986 and 1987 (early trauma system), and 1990 and 1991 (established trauma system) using hospital discharge abstract data. SETTING A total of 18 acute care hospitals in the four-county area encompassing Portland, Ore. PATIENTS A cohort of 70,350 hospitalized patients with at least one discharge diagnosis indicating injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Death during hospitalization. RESULTS After the trauma system was established, 77% of patients in the region with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or greater were admitted to level I trauma centers. More than 72% of patients with an ISS less than 16 were hospitalized in nontrauma centers. Risk of death for injured patients hospitalized at level I trauma centers declined after the trauma system was established (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.81). Patients who died in trauma centers after institution of the trauma system were younger and had more severe injuries, and the majority died within 1 day of admission, whereas patients who died in nontrauma centers died a median of 5 days after admission. CONCLUSION Establishment of a trauma system shifted the more seriously injured patients to level I trauma centers, where there was a significant reduction in the adjusted death rate.

[1]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[2]  D. Lowe,et al.  Patterns of death, complication, and error in the management of motor vehicle accident victims: implications for a regional system of trauma care. , 1982, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  R. Rutledge,et al.  Multivariate population-based analysis of the association of county trauma centers with per capita county trauma death rates. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  E. Sloan,et al.  The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured trauma patients: two years' experience of the Chicago Trauma System. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  D M Steinwachs,et al.  Evaluating performance of statewide regionalized systems of trauma care. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  Ellen J. MacKenzie,et al.  The Effect of Preexisting Conditions on Mortality in Trauma Patients , 1990 .

[7]  G. Kane,et al.  Impact of the Los Angeles County Trauma System on the survival of seriously injured patients. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  Royal Pd.  The value of trauma centres: a methodologic review. , 1987 .

[9]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Investigation of the Relationship Between Volume and Mortality for Surgical Procedures Performed in New York State Hospitals , 1989 .

[10]  E. Fisher,et al.  Prioritizing Oregon's hospital resources. An example based on variations in discretionary medical utilization. , 1992, JAMA.

[11]  S. Shackford,et al.  The effect of regionalization upon the quality of trauma care as assessed by concurrent audit before and after institution of a trauma system: a preliminary report. , 1986, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  T A Gennarelli,et al.  A revision of the Trauma Score. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  D. Trunkey,et al.  Preventable trauma deaths. A review of trauma care systems development. , 1985, JAMA.

[14]  D M Steinwachs,et al.  Classifying Trauma Severity Based on Hospital Discharge Diagnoses: Validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 Conversion Table , 1989, Medical care.

[15]  S Greenland,et al.  Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. , 1989, American journal of public health.