Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach

Biodiversity is presently a minor consideration in environmental policy. It has been regarded as too broad and vague a concept to be applied to real-world regulatoy and managernentproblems. This problem can be corrected ifbio- diversity is recognized as an end in itsea and if measurable indicators can be selected to assess the status of biodiversity over time. Biodiversity, as presently understood, encom- passes multiple levels of biological organization. In thispa- per, I expand the three primay attributes of biodiversity recognized by Jerry Franklin - composition, structure, and function - into a nested hierarcby that incorporates ele- ments of each attribute at four levels of organization: re- gional landscape, community-ecosystem, population- species, andgenetic. Indicators of each attribute in terrestrial ecosystems, at the four levels of organization, are identified for environmental monitoring purposes. Projects to monitor biodiversity will benefit from a direct linkage to long-term ecological research and a commitment to test hypotheses relevant to biodiversity conservation. A general guideline is to proceed from the top down, beginning with a coarse-scale invent0 y of landscape pattern, vegetation, habitat structure, and species distributions, then overlaying data on stress lev- els to identiD biologically significant areas at high risk of impoverishment. Intensive research and monitoring can be directed to high-risk ecosystems and elements of biodiversity, while less intensive monitoring is directed to the total land- scape (or samples thereon. In any monitoringprogram, par- ticular attention should be paid to specifying the questions that monitoring is intended to answer and validating the relationships between indicators and the components of bio- diversity they represent

[1]  Susan E. Cook.  Quest for an index of community structure sensitive to water pollution , 1976 .

[2]  B. V. Horne,et al.  DENSITY AS A MISLEADING INDICATOR OF HABITAT QUALITY , 1983 .

[3]  J. Terborgh,et al.  A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Columbia and Ecuador , 1983 .

[4]  Larry D. Harris,et al.  The fragmented forest : island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity / Larry D. Harris , 1984 .

[5]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds. , 1981 .

[6]  J. Karr.  Population Variability and Extinction in the Avifauna of a Tropical Land Bridge Island , 1982 .

[7]  M. Soulé,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation , 1987 .

[8]  C. Mlot.  Blueprint for conserving plant diversityHow to maximize genetic diversity among rare and endangered plants , 1989 .

[9]  R. Munn.  The design of integrated monitoring systems to provide early indications of environmental/ecological changes , 1988, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[10]  R. Graber,et al.  Environmental evaluations using birds and their habitats / Jean W. Graber, Richard R. Graber. , 1976 .

[11]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[12]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Genetics and Conservation@@@Genetics and Conservation, A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. , 1985 .

[13]  Paul G. Risser,et al.  Landscape ecology : directions and approaches : a workshop held at Allerton Park, Piatt County, Illinois, April 1983 , 1984 .

[14]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[15]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes , 1981 .

[16]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  The Breeding Bird Survey: Its First Fifteen Years, 1965-1979 , 1987 .

[17]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Contribution of Population and Community Biology to Conservation Science , 1988 .

[18]  W. Ott.  Environmental indices: Theory and practice , 1978 .

[19]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  A Regional Landscape Approach to Maintain Diversity , 1983 .

[20]  Larry D. Harris,et al.  Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales , 1986 .

[21]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  On the Risk of Extinction , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at the nature conservancy (USA) , 1987 .

[23]  N. Saha.  Tissue-type plasminogen activator restriction fragment length polymorphism in the Chinese, Indians and Malays of Singapore. , 1989, Human heredity.

[24]  E. J. S.,et al.  Quantitative Plant Ecology , 1934, Nature.

[25]  R. Lande.  Genetics and demography in biological conservation. , 1988, Science.

[26]  P. L. Miller.  Oxidant-induced community change in a mixed conifer forest , 1973 .

[27]  R. Lande,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management , 1987 .

[28]  E. Wilson,et al.  Lessons from Mediterranean-Climate Regions , 1988 .

[29]  J. Franklin,et al.  Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. , 1981 .

[30]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Ecological Uses of Vertebrate Indicator Species: A Critique , 1988 .

[31]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Structural and Functional Diversity in Temperate Forests , 1988 .

[32]  F. Scholz.  Genecological aspects of air pollution effects on northern forests. , 1981 .

[33]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale , 1986 .

[34]  W. Hinds,et al.  Towards Monitoring of Long-term Trends in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1984, Environmental Conservation.

[35]  S. Hurlbert.  The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. , 1971, Ecology.

[36]  M. Schamberger.  Monitoring wildlife habitat – A critique of approaches , 1988 .

[37]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress: Implications for conservation biology. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Carolyn Harrison,et al.  The Archipelago Approach to Conservation: Inspiring but Unproven@@@The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. , 1984 .