Obituary: Charles J. Fillmore

Charles J. Fillmore died at his home in San Francisco on February 13, 2014, of brain cancer. He was 84 years old. Fillmore was one of the world’s pre-eminent scholars of lexical meaning and its relationship with context, grammar, corpora, and computation, and his work had an enormous impact on computational linguistics. His early theoretical work in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s on case grammar and then frame semantics significantly influenced computational linguistics, AI, and knowledge representation. More recent work in the last two decades on FrameNet, a computational lexicon and annotated corpus, influenced corpus linguistics and computational lexicography, and led to modern natural language understanding tasks like semantic role labeling. Fillmore was born and raised in St. Paul, Minnesota, and studied linguistics at the University of Minnesota. As an undergraduate he worked on a pre-computational Latin corpus linguistics project, alphabetizing index cards and building concordances. During his service in the Army in the early 1950s he was stationed for three years in Japan. After his service he became the first US soldier to be discharged locally in Japan, and stayed for three years studying Japanese. He supported himself by teaching English, pioneering a way to make ends meet that afterwards became popular with generations of young Americans abroad. In 1957 he moved back to the United States to attend graduate school at the University of Michigan. At Michigan, Fillmore worked on phonetics, phonology, and syntax, first in the American Structuralist tradition of developing what were called “discovery procedures” for linguistic analysis, algorithms for inducing phones or parts of speech. Discovery procedures were thought of as a methodological tool, a formal procedure that linguists could apply to data to discover linguistic structure, for example inducing parts of speech from the slots in “sentence frames” informed by the distribution of surrounding words. Like many linguistic graduate students of the period, he also worked partly on machine translation, and was interviewed at the time by Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, who was touring US machine translation laboratories in preparation for his famous report on the state of MT (Bar-Hillel 1960). Early in his graduate career, however, Fillmore read Noam Chomsky’s Syntactic Structures and became an immediate proponent of the new transformational grammar. He graduated with his PhD in 1962 and moved to the linguistics department at Ohio State University. In his early work there Fillmore developed a number of early formal properties of generative grammar, such as the idea that rules would re-apply to representations in iterative stages called cycles (Fillmore 1963), a formal mechanism that still plays a role in modern theories of generative grammar.

[1]  Bonnie Nash-Webber,et al.  THE ROLE OF SEMANTICS IN AUTOMATIC SPEECH UNDERSTANDING , 1975 .

[2]  Ding Liu,et al.  Semantic Role Features for Machine Translation , 2010, COLING.

[3]  Gary G. Hendrix,et al.  Language Processing Via Canonical Verbs and Semantic Models , 1973, IJCAI.

[4]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  Unsupervised Semantic Role Labellin , 2004, EMNLP.

[5]  Gerald DeJong,et al.  An Overview of the FRUMP System Introduction , 2014 .

[6]  Dekai Wu,et al.  Improving machine translation by training against an automatic semantic frame based evaluation metric , 2013, ACL.

[7]  Daniel Gildea,et al.  The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles , 2005, CL.

[8]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  SCENES- AND- FRAMES SEMANTICS. , 1977 .

[9]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[10]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  SOME PRINCIPLES OF MEMORY SCHEMATA , 1975 .

[11]  Neville Ryant,et al.  A large-scale classification of English verbs , 2008, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[12]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[13]  J. Clammer Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking , 1976 .

[14]  Martha Palmer,et al.  Class-Based Construction of a Verb Lexicon , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[15]  F. R. Two Semantic Networks : Their Computation and Use for Understanding English Sentences , 2022 .

[16]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Using Semantic Roles to Improve Question Answering , 2007, EMNLP.

[17]  Dell Hymes,et al.  Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: Ways of Speaking , 1989 .

[18]  Ivan Titov,et al.  Semantic Role Labeling , 2010, HLT-NAACL.

[19]  Liliana Simón,et al.  Ways of speaking , 2021, Language and Nationality.

[20]  C. Fillmore An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning , 1975 .

[21]  Xavier Carreras,et al.  Semantic Role Labeling: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 2008, Computational Linguistics.

[22]  Daniel Gildea,et al.  The Necessity of Parsing for Predicate Argument Recognition , 2002, ACL.

[23]  C. Fillmore Lectures on Deixis , 1997 .

[24]  M. Tomasello Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 2003 .

[25]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  Learning to Rank Answers to Non-Factoid Questions from Web Collections , 2011, CL.

[26]  Charles J. Fillmore Encounters with Language , 2012, Computational Linguistics.

[27]  Philipp Koehn,et al.  Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies , 2016 .

[28]  L. Eichinger,et al.  Valency and Semantic Roles: the Concept of Deep Structure Case , 2003 .

[29]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[30]  Lucien Tesnière Éléments de syntaxe structurale , 1959 .

[31]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  On Overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language , 1976, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  C. Fillmore Indirect Object Constructions In English And The Ordering Of Transformations , 1965 .

[33]  Nathanael Chambers,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Narrative Schemas and their Participants , 2009, ACL.

[34]  Nathanael Chambers,et al.  Template-Based Information Extraction without the Templates , 2011, ACL.

[35]  Collin F. Baker,et al.  A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis , 2009 .

[36]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  An artificial intelligence approach to machine translation. , 1972 .

[37]  Sergei Nirenburg,et al.  The Present Status of Automatic Translation of Languages , 2003 .

[38]  John B. Lowe,et al.  The Berkeley FrameNet Project , 1998, ACL.

[39]  C. Fillmore Some Problems for Case Grammar , 1971 .

[40]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Frames and the semantics of understanding , 1985 .

[41]  Christopher R. Johnson,et al.  Background to Framenet , 2003 .

[42]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Automatic Labeling of Semantic Roles , 2002, CL.

[43]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[44]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Similarity-Driven Semantic Role Induction via Graph Partitioning , 2014, CL.

[45]  Beth Levin,et al.  Mapping Sentences to Case Frames , 1977 .

[46]  C. Fillmore FRAME SEMANTICS AND THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE * , 1976 .

[47]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[48]  Yehoshua Bar-Hillel,et al.  The Present Status of Automatic Translation of Languages , 1960, Adv. Comput..

[49]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  GUS, A Frame-Driven Dialog System , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[50]  G. Lakoff Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think , 1996 .

[51]  C. Fillmore The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[52]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The semantics of Risk and its Neighbors , 2015 .

[53]  Miriam R. L. Petruck FRAME SEMANTICS , 1996 .

[54]  Farrell Ackerman,et al.  Charles J. Fillmore , 2014 .

[55]  C. Fillmore,et al.  The position of embedding transformations in a grammar . Some syntactic rules in Mandarin . Tree representations in linguistics , 1963 .

[56]  J. Toomasian The Case for the Case , 2016, Perfusion.