A DECISION SUPPORT TOOL ON DERELICT BUILDINGS FOR URBAN REGENERATION

Abstract. We present a decision suppport tool for the comparison and selection of projects of integrated renovation of derelict buildings and areas for the purpose of urban regeneration. Each project is defined as a subset of derelict properties to renovate together with their respective designated use, and is scored by the decision support tool on two criteria: expected effort and estimated effectiveness in terms of improved urban capabilities in the urban area of interest. The expected effort is estimated as a global transformation cost, factoring in legal and management overhead costs as well as possible economies of scale. The effectiveness in evaluated in terms of extension of urban capabilities centred on walkable distances. We have implemented a bi-objective evolutionary search algorithm to address the computational complexity of the problem of search for efficient (non-dominated) projects over the two criteria. For the purpose of illustration, we present an example case-study application on the historical core of the city of Sassari, Italy.

[1]  J. Wilson,et al.  BROKEN WINDOWS: THE POLICE AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SAFETY , 1982 .

[2]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[3]  Arnaldo Cecchini,et al.  Evaluating walkability: a capability-wise planning and design support system , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Georgios K. Ouzounis,et al.  Smart cities of the future , 2012, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[5]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban regeneration decision-making based on entropy weight method: Case study of yuzhong peninsula, China , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[9]  Amy Hsin-I Lee,et al.  An integrated decision making model for district revitalization and regeneration project selection , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Giuseppe A. Trunfio,et al.  GPU-accelerated multi-objective optimization of fuel treatments for mitigating wildfire hazard , 2015, J. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Arnaldo Cecchini,et al.  A Decision Support Tool Coupling a Causal Model and a Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm , 2005, IEA/AIE.

[12]  Huey-Jiun Wang,et al.  A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  Genetic algorithms and permutation problems: a comparison of recombination operators for neural net structure specification , 1992, [Proceedings] COGANN-92: International Workshop on Combinations of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks.

[14]  D Quagliarella Genetic algorithms and evolution strategy in engineering and computer science : recent advances and industrial applications , 1998 .

[15]  Laetitia Vermeulen-Jourdan,et al.  Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization: Problematic and Context , 2010, Advances in Multi-Objective Nature Inspired Computing.

[16]  I. Blecic,et al.  The Capability Approach in Urban Quality of Life and Urban Policies: Towards a Conceptual Framework , 2013 .

[17]  Mikkel T. Jensen,et al.  Reducing the run-time complexity of multiobjective EAs: The NSGA-II and other algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[18]  Arnaldo Cecchini,et al.  Computer-Aided Drafting of Urban Designs for Walkability , 2017, ICCSA.

[19]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Messy Genetic Algorithms: Motivation, Analysis, and First Results , 1989, Complex Syst..

[20]  Sebastian Schädler,et al.  Applying a multi-criteria genetic algorithm framework for brownfield reuse optimization: improving redevelopment options based on stakeholder preferences. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  An exploratory approach to spatial decision support , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[22]  Antonio Nesticò,et al.  A model to support the public administration decisions for the investments selection on historic buildings , 2018, Journal of Cultural Heritage.