Fuzzy algorithm for estimating average breach widths of embankment dams

Dam breach width significantly influences peak breach outflow, inundation levels, and flood arrival time, but uncertainties inherent in the prediction of its value for embankment dams make its accurate estimation a challenging task in dam risk assessments. The key focus of this paper is to provide a fuzzy logic (FL) model for estimating the average breach width of embankment dams as an alternative to regression equations (RE). The FL approach is capable of handling nonlinear behavior, imprecision in discrete measurements, and parameter uncertainty. Historical data from 69 embankment dam failures are used in the development and testing of the FL model. Application of the FL model is also presented for estimating average breach widths of two case studies that have adequately documented data. The accuracy of the FL rule-based model is investigated using uncertainty analysis: the mean prediction error between the FL estimates and the observed average breach widths is very small (=0.03) and comparable to that achieved using the best available RE. Moreover, the FL uncertainty band is found to be approximately ±0.51 order of magnitude smaller than the ±0.56 order of magnitude achieved with the best available RE. The simulation results indicate the potential of the FL model to be used as a predictive tool for estimating the average breach width of embankment dams.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[2]  F. A. Johnson.  A classification of dam failures , 1977 .

[3]  Tony L. Wahl,et al.  Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters , 2004 .

[4]  E. H. Mamdani,et al.  Application of Fuzzy Logic to Approximate Reasoning Using Linguistic Synthesis , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Breach erosion of earthfill dams (BEED) model , 1988 .

[6]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Embankment Dam Breach Parameters Revisited , 1995 .

[7]  Árni Snorrason,et al.  Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models , 1984 .

[8]  Harrison M. Wadsworth.  Handbook of Statistical Methods for Engineers and Scientists , 1990 .

[9]  Thomas C. MacDonald,et al.  Breaching Charateristics of Dam Failures , 1984 .

[10]  Gregory J. Hanson,et al.  Physical modeling of overtopping erosion and breach formation of cohesive embankments , 2005 .

[11]  Paul J. Visser,et al.  Breach growth in sand-dikes , 1998 .

[12]  T. Ross.  Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[13]  Victor Miguel Ponce,et al.  Modeling Gradual Dam Breaches , 1981 .

[14]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Embankment Dam Breach Parameters and Their Uncertainties , 2008 .

[15]  S. Yochum,et al.  Case Study of the Big Bay Dam Failure: Accuracy and Comparison of Breach Predictions , 2008 .

[16]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  EMBANKMENT-DAM BREACH PARAMETERS. , 1987 .