Bidirectional and RO Methods for Analysis of Stream-Intensive Applications over Mobile IP Network

These Applications such as voice over IP present many challenges to the design of mobile networks. The mobile networks are constantly changing and the latest devices like smart phones, mobile enabled laptops such as Windows Mobile and the Windows Phone are truly able to delivering on any mobile broadband. Therefore, the Internet service providers must provide enhanced routing methods for delivering a stream- intensive traffic to the customers. This paper focuses on performance evaluation of mobile IPv6 routing methods. This evaluation is based on end-to- end delay, packet delay variation, and IPv6 traffic dropped. Streszczenie. Mobilne sieci ulegają stalym zmianom I nowoczesne urządzenia mobilne jak smarfony czy tablety są w stanie dopasowac sia)e do tych zmian. Dlatego zarządzający serwisem Internetowym powinien wprowadzac ulepszone metody dostarczania strumienia informacji. W artykule analizowano mozliwości ulepszenia systemu mobilnego IPv6. (Dwukierunkowa i optymalizowana metoda analizy aplikacji o zwiekszonym strumieniu informacji w sieciach mobilnych)

[1]  A. Samjani.  Mobile Internet protocol , 2001 .

[2]  Shubhranshu Singh,et al.  A DHCPv6 Based IPv6 Autoconfiguration Mechanism for Subordinate MANET , 2008, 2008 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference.

[3]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A simulation study on the performance of Mobile IPv6 in a WLAN-based cellular network , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Dieter Hogrefe,et al.  E²T: End-to-End Tunneling Extension to Mobile IPv6 , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[5]  Donghui Guo,et al.  Mobile IPv6 in WLAN mobile networks and its implementation , 2003, 14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003..

[6]  Jan-Ming Ho,et al.  Bi-directional route optimization in mobile IP over wireless LAN , 2002, Proceedings IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[7]  S. Samolej,et al.  HTCPNs – based analysis of priority-based Internet requests scheduling , 2010 .

[8]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[9]  Hao Chen,et al.  Simulation of route optimization in Mobile IP , 2002, 27th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, 2002. Proceedings. LCN 2002..

[10]  Abdul Hanan Abdullah,et al.  A mathematical model to determine the maximum end-to-end delay bound on label switched path for real time applications over mobile IPv6 , 2011 .

[11]  Deguang Le,et al.  Tunnelling-based route optimization for Mobile IPv6 , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security.

[12]  Sheng-Cheng Yeh,et al.  DiffServ‐based bandwidth‐constrained anycast routing in a mobile IPv6 network , 2011, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[13]  Qiang Gao,et al.  A virtual home agent based route optimization for mobile IP , 2000, 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540).

[14]  Abdul Hanan Abdullah,et al.  A cross-layer scheme for resource reservation based on multi-protocol label switching over mobile IP version6 , 2011 .

[15]  Giuliana Iapichino.  IPv6 mobility and ad hoc network mobility overview report , 2008 .

[16]  Junde Song,et al.  Seamless Mobility Using Mobile IPv6 , 2005, 2005 2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications and Systems.

[17]  Bill Fenner.  Experimental Values In IPv4, IPv6, ICMPv4, ICMPv6, UDP, and TCP Headers , 2006, RFC.

[18]  Thomas Narten,et al.  Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) , 2007, RFC.

[19]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Anonymous Home Binding Update Scheme for Mobile IPv6 Wireless Networking , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[20]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A simulation study on the performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 , 2003 .