The development of a sensor-based system for older people: a case study

An aging population is creating increasing pressures on health care systems. Assistive technologies including telecare monitoring applications installed in the home are being promoted as part of the solution. These systems differ from other more interactive systems both in using sensor-based technologies and having older users, aspects that can affect the way the user is viewed, which in turn can affect what is prioritised in design decisions. However little is known to date about the processes involved in designing such systems, especially from the perspective of how 'users' are considered. To explore this we studied a development project in telecare with a focus on how the user discourse evolved. Using qualitative methods and thematic analysis, we identified two broad themes about how 'users' are considered: the disappearing older user, where the discussion moved from rich pictures of older people's lives to sense-able scenarios; and the privileged developer, where representations of older relatives were mediated by the developers' stories of their own relatives, inadvertently prioritising their own needs as carers for those relatives. The findings demonstrate some of the challenges for a user-centred design process that can occur when working with sensor-based systems and older people that could have implications for whether these systems will be accepted.

[1]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[2]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  HODI: a technique for visually capturing and preserving design rationale , 2012, OZCHI.

[3]  M. Mort,et al.  Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? , 2013, Sociology of health & illness.

[4]  Mads Bødker,et al.  The elephant in the room: ambiguity and temporary closure in a design process , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[5]  Rita Cucchiara,et al.  Using computer vision techniques for dangerous situation detection in domotic applications , 2004 .

[6]  Erin Friess,et al.  Personas and decision making in the design process: an ethnographic case study , 2012, CHI.

[7]  Mattias Arvola,et al.  Personas in action: ethnography in an interaction design team , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[8]  Heather Draper,et al.  Telecare, Remote Monitoring and Care , 2013, Bioethics.

[9]  J. Barlow,et al.  A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  Lars Tornstam,et al.  Gerotranscendence: A Developmental Theory of Positive Aging , 2005 .

[11]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Engaging older people using participatory design , 2012, CHI.

[12]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  A survey of user-centered design practice , 2002, CHI.

[13]  Joseph P. Wherton,et al.  The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis , 2012, BMJ Open.

[14]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[15]  Ayse Basar Bener,et al.  Implementation of a Software Quality Improvement Project in an SME: A Before and After Comparison , 2009, 2009 35th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.

[16]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  Project teams: profiles and member perceptions-implications for group support system research and products , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  N. Vodjdani,et al.  The ambient assisted living joint programme , 2008, 2008 2nd Electronics System-Integration Technology Conference.

[18]  Matthew A. Lievesley,et al.  Surrogate users: a pragmatic approach to defining user needs , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Thomas Erickson The design and long-term use of a personal electronic notebook: a reflective analysis , 1996, CHI '96.

[20]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Socially dependable design: The challenge of ageing populations for HCI , 2005, Interact. Comput..