Effectiveness of Collaborative Tool Usage for Virtual Team Activities

This research explores the use of collaborative tools and their relationship with team tasks to develop a better understanding of computer support of virtual teaming from the theoretical perspective of Adaptive Structuration Theory (AST). High-level IT executives from 53 large organizations surveyed were asked to identify: 1) which collaborative tools are used within their organizations; 2) their frequency of use; 3) how they are used; and 4) how successful the tools are. AST, which has previously been applied to studies of technologies supporting group work (Poole and DeSanctis, 1990) conceives of technology use as a social practice that emerges over time. Successful use of a technology is dependent upon the effectiveness with which groups appropriate and modify the technology to meet their needs. The research discusses the differences in how collaborative tools are used between highand low-performing virtual teaming groups, as well as how different organization structures appear at different stages of virtual team development.

[1]  P BostromRobert,et al.  A longitudinal study of the impact of group decision support systems on group development , 1990 .

[2]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[3]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Leading Business Teams: How Teams Can Use Technology and Group Process Tools to Enhance Performance , 1991 .

[4]  L. Feldman,et al.  Teams and technology: Fulfilling the promise of the new organization , 1997 .

[5]  Jack D. Becker,et al.  Collaborative Technology Tools for Virtual Teaming , 1999 .

[6]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Bongsik Shin,et al.  The Dynamic Effects of Group Support Systems on Group Meetings , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Stanley G. Harris,et al.  Functions of Parting CEremonies in Dying Organizations , 1986 .

[9]  David Coleman,et al.  Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANs and Intranets , 1997 .

[10]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  R. Johansen,et al.  Electronic meetings : technical alternatives and social choices , 1979 .

[13]  Jack Becke,et al.  BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGY TOOLS AND VIRTUAL TEAMS , 2001 .

[14]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[16]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[18]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects , 1993 .