Computer usage and access in low-income urban communities

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of home computer access on low-income families participating in the Computer for Families program. The study focused on participants (1) general computer usage, access and knowledge; (2) employment; (3) education; and (4) their children's-computer access, usage and academic performance. The study methodology consisted of a quasi-experimental design using qualitative and quantitative approaches, including focus groups, pretests and post-tests, and self-reported surveys with experimental and control groups. Statistically significant findings suggest that participants in the Computers for Families program were more likely than non-participants to have access to the Internet from home, use a computer for more than 1h per day, complete online job applications, and submit job applications and resumes electronically. Social and behavioral implications regarding computer access and usage in low-income urban communities are discussed.

[1]  Joseph Turow,et al.  The Internet and the family: the view from parents , 1999 .

[2]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[3]  Simone C. O. Conceição,et al.  Narrowing the Digital Divide in Low-Income, Urban Communities , 2004 .

[4]  M. K. Eamon,et al.  Digital Divide in Computer Access and Use Between Poor and Non-Poor Youth , 2004, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[5]  André Brock,et al.  "A Belief in Humanity is a Belief in Colored Men: " Using Culture to Span the Digital Divide , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Rowena Cullen,et al.  Handbook of Research on Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society , 2011 .

[7]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Jacob L. Vigdor,et al.  Scaling the Digital Divide: Home Computer Technology and Student Achievement , 2010 .

[9]  Rowena Cullen,et al.  Addressing the digital divide , 2001, Online Inf. Rev..

[10]  Fay Cobb Payton,et al.  Rethinking the digital divide , 2003, CACM.

[11]  S. Smith,et al.  “Don’t put my name on it”: Social Capital Activation and Job‐Finding Assistance among the Black Urban Poor1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  F. Biocca,et al.  Does home internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children? , 2006 .

[13]  Lisa J. Servon,et al.  Community Technology Centers: Narrowing the Digital Divide in Low-Income, Urban Communities , 2001 .

[14]  Jie Huang,et al.  The digital divide and academic achievement , 2006, Electron. Libr..

[15]  Susan B. Neuman,et al.  The knowledge gap: Implications of leveling the playing field for low‐income and middle‐income children , 2006 .

[16]  M. Guillén,et al.  THE GLOBAL DIGITAL DIVIDE : ECONOMIC , POLITICAL , AND SOCIOLOGICAL DRIVERS OF CROSS-NATIONAL INTERNET USE , 2005 .

[17]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  The Racial Digital Divide: Motivational, Affective, and Cognitive Correlates of Internet Use1 , 2001 .

[18]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Problematizing "New Media": Culturally Based Perceptions of Cell Phones, Computers, and the Internet among United States Latinos , 2003 .

[19]  Yogesh K. Dwivedi,et al.  Handbook of Research on Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society , 2009 .

[20]  A. Bandura.  Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. , 1989 .

[21]  Yvonne A. Unrau,et al.  Program Evaluation for Social Workers: Foundations of Evidence-Based Programs , 2009 .