Light-Weight Stackelberg Game Theoretic Demand Response Scheme for Massive Smart Manufacturing Systems

As Internet-of-Things (IoT) technology emerges, smart manufacturing has recently attracted a large amount of attention. Smart manufacturing leads to smart energy management because of its significant operating expenditure savings. However, it is believed that centralized energy management of IoT devices will impose critically large overhead since massive numbers of IoT devices are expected to be deployed. Therefore, distributed energy management or demand response (DR) is deemed to be a better solution for emerging massive smart manufacturing systems. There have been a significant number of distributed DR algorithms, including Stackelberg game theoretic approaches. However, the Stackelberg game theoretic approaches require a large number of iterations to reach Nash equilibrium, which in turn necessitates communication overheads among IoT devices. This communication overhead causes a large amount of energy consumption as well as delay. In this paper, we propose a light-weight DR scheme based on the Stackelberg model without iterations for the massive smart manufacturing systems. The proposed scheme manages energy consumption based on a non-iterative Stackelberg model and historical real-time pricing. To the best of our knowledge, our approach is the first technique that considers communication overheads for the DR technique. The performance evaluation demonstrates that the proposed scheme shifts operations to avoid peak loads, and the electricity bill is significantly reduced, operations occur at preferred times, and communication energy consumption and delay are minimized.

[1]  Pan Yiqun,et al.  Building Energy Use Prediction Using Time Series Analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE 6th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications.

[2]  Azam Khalili,et al.  Fully Distributed Demand Response Using the Adaptive Diffusion–Stackelberg Algorithm , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  Manuel Berenguel,et al.  A Comparison of Energy Consumption Prediction Models Based on Neural Networks of a Bioclimatic Building , 2016 .

[4]  Irene Krebs,et al.  The optimal sequence of production orders, taking into account the cost of delays , 2016 .

[5]  A. R. Aoki,et al.  Centralized and decentralized approaches to demand response using smart plugs , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition.

[6]  Fei Tao,et al.  New IT Driven Service-Oriented Smart Manufacturing: Framework and Characteristics , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[7]  Rob J. Hyndman Moving Averages , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[8]  Qun Zhou,et al.  Impact of demand response contracts on load forecasting in a smart grid environment , 2012, PES 2012.

[9]  Michael Starke,et al.  Demand-Side Response from Industrial Loads , 2013 .

[10]  Mehrdad Kazerani,et al.  Impact of demand response management on improving social welfare of remote communities through integrating renewable energy resources , 2017, 2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[11]  Joongheon Kim,et al.  Residential Demand Response for Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[12]  Jiming Chen,et al.  A Survey on Demand Response in Smart Grids: Mathematical Models and Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[13]  Elmar Hartweg Smart Factories – Self-Organizing Production Units , 2014 .

[14]  Heinrich von Stackelberg Market Structure and Equilibrium , 2010 .

[15]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..