FDG PET-CT As an Important Diagnostic Tool and Prognostic Marker in Suspected Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma After Radiotherapy: Comparison with MRI

Abstract Background Recurrent disease in post-irradiation patients with cervical cancer is often difficult to delineate on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), because posttreatment changes can have a similar appearance, and further evaluation is often required. The aims of the study were to evaluate positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET-CT) diagnostic role in suspected recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy, compare it to MRI, and assess their prognostic impact in these patients. Patients and methods This cohort retrospective study included patients previously treated with radiotherapy for carcinoma of uterine cervix with suspected recurrence, who had undergone MRI of abdomen and pelvis, and were subsequently evaluated on FDG PET-CT, with minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Results In the total of 84 patients included in analysis, MRI vs. FDG PET-CT showed sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 80.1%, 52.4% and 66.7%, vs. 97.6%, 61.9% and 79.8%, respectively. Patients with positive findings on MRI (Log Rank, p = 0.003) and PET-CT (Log Rank, p < 0.001) had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with negative results. In univariate Cox regression models, MRI and FDG PET-CT results were found to be related to PFS (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, multivariate analysis proved only FDG PET-CT to be independent prognostic factor, where patients with positive FDG PET-CT results had almost nine times higher risk of progression (p < 0.001). Conclusion FDG PET-CT represents useful diagnostic tool in suspected recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy, showing high sensitivity in its detection. In addition, it is an independent factor in predicting progression-free survival in these patients.

[1]  A. Yapar,et al.  Long-term outcomes of cervical cancer patients with complete metabolic response after definitive chemoradiotherapy , 2021, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  A. Rockall,et al.  FDG-PET Imaging in Cervical Cancer. , 2019, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  Young Seok Kim,et al.  Prognostic value of post-treatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in uterine cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[5]  D. Aoki,et al.  Cancer of the cervix uteri , 2018, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[6]  S. Woo,et al.  Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Metabolic Parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  S. Palaniswamy,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of cancer cervix: Where do we stand today? , 2018, Nuclear medicine communications.

[8]  J. Robbins,et al.  MR Imaging in Cervical Cancer: Initial Staging and Treatment. , 2023, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  C. Fuller,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Outcome in Cervical Cancer After Chemoradiation. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  H. Hricak,et al.  Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[11]  P. Auguste,et al.  Evaluating PET‐CT in the detection and management of recurrent cervical cancer: systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy and subjective elicitation , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  Ai Zheng,et al.  Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET or PET-CT in recurrent cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Nuclear medicine communications.

[13]  E. Brun,et al.  Clinical Impact of 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-Glucose (FDG)–Positron Emission Tomography (PET) on Treatment Choice in Recurrent Cancer of the Cervix Uteri , 2013, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[14]  H. Chung,et al.  Predictive role of post-treatment [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[15]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  C. Bodet-Milin,et al.  Clinical and survival impact of FDG PET in patients with suspicion of recurrent cervical carcinoma , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  T. Yen,et al.  Standardized uptake value in para-aortic lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in patients with primary advanced squamous cervical cancer , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. , 2007, JAMA.

[19]  P. Grigsby,et al.  The standardized uptake value for F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival , 2007, Cancer.

[20]  Guy Storme,et al.  Prognostic value of histopathology and trends in cervical cancer : a SEER population study , 2007 .

[21]  T. Yen,et al.  Comparative benefits and limitations of 18F-FDG PET and CT-MRI in documented or suspected recurrent cervical cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  Imran Zoberi,et al.  Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  T. Yen,et al.  Restaging of recurrent cervical carcinoma with dual‐phase [18F]fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography , 2004, Cancer.

[24]  T. Rollason Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract , 2003, Springer New York.

[25]  T. Myhr,et al.  Long-term results of concurrent radiation and chemotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix recurrent after surgery , 1992, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[26]  P. Maisonneuve,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. , 2006, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.