A rational approach to handling fuzzy perceptions in route choice

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to develop a heuristic way for handling fuzzy perceptions in explaining route choice behavior from behavioral point of view. A hybrid model where route choice decision making is described in a hierarchy uses concepts from fuzzy logic and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is proposed for making possible a more proper description of route choice behavior in transportation systems. Teodorovic and Kikuchi’s [Transportation route choice model using fuzzy inference technique, Paper presented at the First International Symposium on: Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis: Fuzzy Reasoning, Probabilistic Models, and Risk Management, University of College Park, Maryland, 1990, p. 140] fuzzy ‘if-then’ rules are adopted to represent a typical driver’s psychology for capturing essential preferences, pairwise, among alternatives that a driver may consider. The AHP is then incorporated in this model to capture the imaginary psychological process that represent underlying observable behavior to estimate drivers’ preference allotment among the alternatives. This new procedure is applied in a real world sample based on stated values of subjects. Findings show that this method provides intuitively and statistically promising results.

[1]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Models for route choice behavior in the presence of information using concepts from fuzzy set theory and approximate reasoning , 1993 .

[2]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  A Thurstonian view of the analytic hierarchy process , 1996 .

[3]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[4]  D. Teodorovic,et al.  Transportation route choice model using fuzzy inference technique , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis.

[5]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting. , 1980 .

[6]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans , 2008 .

[7]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Computational-Process Modelling of Household Activity Scheduling , 1993 .

[8]  Simona Ronchi Della Rocca,et al.  λ Δ -Models , 2004 .

[9]  A PSYCHOMETRIC APPROACH FOR RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS , 2003 .

[10]  Saul I. Gass,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Exposition , 2001, Oper. Res..

[11]  Reza Banai-Kashani,et al.  Discrete mode-choice analysis of urban travel demand by the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1989 .

[12]  M. Ridwan,et al.  FUZZY PREFERENCE BASED ROUTE CHOICE MODEL , 2003 .

[13]  Kaori Mizutani,et al.  An Approach of Hybrid models based on Fuzzy reasoning and Logit models , 2001 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Thought , 1979 .

[15]  T. Saaty Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[16]  S. Glaister Urban travel demand : Thomas A. Domencich and Daniel McFadden, (North-Holland Amsterdam, 1975) pp. xvi + 216, $23.25. , 1977 .

[17]  Norbert Oppenheim,et al.  Urban Travel Demand Modeling: From Individual Choices to General Equilibrium , 1995 .

[18]  J. Dyer Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[19]  Luis G. Vargas An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications , 1990 .

[20]  T. Saaty What is relative measurement? The ratio scale phantom , 1993 .

[21]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[22]  C. Yeh,et al.  An algorithm for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems (Cat. No.97TH8335).

[23]  Dušan Teodorović,et al.  FUZZY LOGIC SYSTEMS FOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING: THE STATE OF THE ART , 1999 .

[24]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1987 .