Combining Dynamic Stretch and Tunable Stiffness to Probe Cell Mechanobiology In Vitro

Cells have the ability to actively sense their mechanical environment and respond to both substrate stiffness and stretch by altering their adhesion, proliferation, locomotion, morphology, and synthetic profile. In order to elucidate the interrelated effects of different mechanical stimuli on cell phenotype in vitro, we have developed a method for culturing mammalian cells in a two-dimensional environment at a wide range of combined levels of substrate stiffness and dynamic stretch. Polyacrylamide gels were covalently bonded to flexible silicone culture plates and coated with monomeric collagen for cell adhesion. Substrate stiffness was adjusted from relatively soft (G′ = 0.3 kPa) to stiff (G′ = 50 kPa) by altering the ratio of acrylamide to bis-acrylamide, and the silicone membranes were stretched over circular loading posts by applying vacuum pressure to impart near-uniform stretch, as confirmed by strain field analysis. As a demonstration of the system, porcine aortic valve interstitial cells (VIC) and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) were plated on soft and stiff substrates either statically cultured or exposed to 10% equibiaxial or pure uniaxial stretch at 1Hz for 6 hours. In all cases, cell attachment and cell viability were high. On soft substrates, VICs cultured statically exhibit a small rounded morphology, significantly smaller than on stiff substrates (p<0.05). Following equibiaxial cyclic stretch, VICs spread to the extent of cells cultured on stiff substrates, but did not reorient in response to uniaxial stretch to the extent of cells stretched on stiff substrates. hMSCs exhibited a less pronounced response than VICs, likely due to a lower stiffness threshold for spreading on static gels. These preliminary data demonstrate that inhibition of spreading due to a lack of matrix stiffness surrounding a cell may be overcome by externally applied stretch suggesting similar mechanotransduction mechanisms for sensing stiffness and stretch.

[1]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Identifying unfolding intermediates of FN-III(10) by steered molecular dynamics. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[3]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[4]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[5]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  A photo-modulatable material for probing cellular responses to substrate rigidity. , 2009, Soft matter.

[7]  J. Wang,et al.  Mechanobiological response of tendon stem cells: Implications of tendon homeostasis and pathogenesis of tendinopathy , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  S. Margulies,et al.  Equibiaxial deformation-induced injury of alveolar epithelial cells in vitro. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[9]  Boris Martinac,et al.  Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[10]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Robert M. Nerem,et al.  Dynamic Mechanical Conditioning of Collagen-Gel Blood Vessel Constructs Induces Remodeling In Vitro , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Timothy J Gardner,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[13]  J. Wang,et al.  Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression enhances cell traction force. , 2007, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[14]  Simon P. Hoerstrup,et al.  Tissue Engineering of Functional Trileaflet Heart Valves From Human Marrow Stromal Cells , 2002, Circulation.

[15]  C. Simmons,et al.  Cyclic strain enhances matrix mineralization by adult human mesenchymal stem cells via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) signaling pathway. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  John A. Pedersen,et al.  Mechanobiology in the Third Dimension , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Susan Q. Vanderzyl,et al.  Stretch-Induced Stress Fiber Remodeling and the Activations of JNK and ERK Depend on Mechanical Strain Rate, but Not FAK , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  Andrew D McCulloch,et al.  Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Jennifer L. West,et al.  Synthetic Materials in the Study of Cell Response to Substrate Rigidity , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Craig A Simmons,et al.  Calcification by Valve Interstitial Cells Is Regulated by the Stiffness of the Extracellular Matrix , 2009, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[21]  Jennifer S. Park,et al.  Mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cells and their use in cardiovascular repair. , 2007, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[22]  A. Banes,et al.  Mechanoreception at the cellular level: the detection, interpretation, and diversity of responses to mechanical signals. , 1995, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[23]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Advanced bioreactor with controlled application of multi-dimensional strain for tissue engineering. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Substrate Stiffness and Cell Area Predict Cellular Traction Stresses in Single Cells and Cells in Contact , 2010, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[25]  S Glagov,et al.  Cyclic stretching stimulates synthesis of matrix components by arterial smooth muscle cells in vitro. , 2003, Science.

[26]  K. Billiar,et al.  Equibiaxial cyclic stretch stimulates fibroblasts to rapidly remodel fibrin. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  R. Kaunas,et al.  A Dynamic Stochastic Model of Frequency-Dependent Stress Fiber Alignment Induced by Cyclic Stretch , 2009, PloS one.

[28]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-beta induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts. , 1999, The American journal of pathology.

[29]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[30]  G. Gabbiani,et al.  The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[31]  J. H. Wang,et al.  An Introductory Review of Cell Mechanobiology , 2006, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[32]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[33]  J. H. Wang,et al.  Substrate deformation determines actin cytoskeleton reorganization: A mathematical modeling and experimental study. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[35]  J D Humphrey,et al.  A constrained mixture model for arterial adaptations to a sustained step change in blood flow , 2003, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[36]  Shu Chien,et al.  Cooperative effects of Rho and mechanical stretch on stress fiber organization. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  Surface properties and hemocompatibility of alkyl-siloxane monolayers supported on silicone rubber: effect of alkyl chain length and ionic functionality. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[38]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[39]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-β induction of α-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts , 1999 .

[40]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Reinforcement versus Fluidization in Cytoskeletal Mechanoresponsiveness , 2009, PloS one.

[41]  F. Yin,et al.  Contractility Affects Stress Fiber Remodeling and Reorientation of Endothelial Cells Subjected to Cyclic Mechanical Stretching , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  P. Dartsch,et al.  Response of cultured endothelial cells to mechanical stimulation , 1989, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[43]  Dong Wang,et al.  A stretching device for imaging real-time molecular dynamics of live cells adhering to elastic membranes on inverted microscopes during the entire process of the stretch. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[44]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[45]  G. N. Antonova,et al.  Mechano-chemical control of human endothelium orientation and size , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[47]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[48]  T. Young,et al.  Effects of Cyclic Mechanical Stretching on the mRNA Expression of Tendon/Ligament-Related and Osteoblast-Specific Genes in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2008, Connective tissue research.

[49]  Gaurav Sharma,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of a subpixel extended phase correlation method to determine micron level displacements in the heart. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[50]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Song Li,et al.  Anisotropic mechanosensing by mesenchymal stem cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.