Adaptive cruise control design with consideration of humans' driving psychology

For autonomous vehicles, adaptive cruise control (ACC) system should be designed to behave similarly to humans' driving habits, in order to be acceptable. Therefore, a human-like ACC algorithm is proposed in model predictive control (MPC) framework. Not only driving safety and comfort are guaranteed in the control algorithm, but also the efficient car-following requirement (time optimal) is considered to emulate humans' driving psychology and decrease the settling time of responses. In MPC framework, the control algorithm is finally transformed to an online mixed integer nonlinear programming, which is solved by the two-loop optimization method. The simulation results show that the proposed ACC control algorithm performs similarly to humans' driving habits, and meanwhile provides safe, comfortable, and efficient car-following behavior.

[1]  Kyongsu Yi,et al.  Human driving data-based design of a vehicle adaptive cruise control algorithm , 2008 .

[2]  Xi Chen,et al.  Nested Tabu Search (TS) and Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) Method, Combined with Adaptive Model Reformulation for Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis (HENS) , 2008 .

[3]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  Human-Like Adaptive Cruise Control Systems through a Learning Machine Approach , 2009 .

[4]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Longitudinal control of heavy trucks in mixed traffic: environmental and fuel economy considerations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Lei Zhang,et al.  An Adaptive Longitudinal Driving Assistance System Based on Driver Characteristics , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  A survey of industrial model predictive control technology , 2003 .

[7]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  Vehicle dynamics and control , 2005 .

[8]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[9]  Carlos Canudas-de-Wit,et al.  A Safe Longitudinal Control for Adaptive Cruise Control and Stop-and-Go Scenarios , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicles for improved flow stability and string stability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  ACC/CACC-control design, stability and robust performance , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[12]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Model Predictive Multi-Objective Vehicular Adaptive Cruise Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  Atanas A. Popov,et al.  Model predictive control with constraints for a nonlinear adaptive cruise control vehicle model in transition manoeuvres , 2013 .

[14]  Aurelio González-Villaseñor,et al.  Application of the “Contact Convoy” Concept to Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[15]  Jean Buisson,et al.  Intelligent transportation systems: a safe, robust and comfortable strategy for longitudinal monitoring , 2009 .

[16]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Review of urban traffic management and the impacts of new vehicle technologies , 2009 .

[17]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  On spacing policies for highway vehicle automation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..