Value Co-Creation Process and Measurement in 4.0 SMEs: An Exploratory Research in a B2B Marketing Innovation Context

The purpose of this exploratory research is to contribute to the lack of empirical research exploring techniques and protocols that can be used to measure the level of value obtained from using these technologies in the various marketing processes and in a business-to-business (B2B) context. By doing so, firms operating in fast changing dynamic environments can develop the right means to continuously adapt, integrate, reconfigure, and redeploy resources and capabilities to become more competitive and disruptive in their offerings. The phenomenon of interest is described by applying a case study qualitative approach to three 4.0 companies which use virtual reality (VR)/augmented reality (AR) technologies and by carrying out ten in-depth interviews to managers in those organizations. Results show that some small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) are more rigorous about performance and tracking metrics compared to other companies providing similar technological services. In this line, results show two stages where potential value can be generated and measured when utilizing VR/AR technologies. The first is during testing and development of VR/AR simulations. In this stage, only the ones with strong research and academic background have been developing and using tracking systems, guidelines, and protocols as resources to measure the value obtained from using these technologies in marketing innovation processes. The second moment where value creation can be measured is during the implementation of the VR/AR simulation with the target user. Further research is needed to develop standardization guidelines and protocols that guarantee the success of the simulations delivered to the hiring firms.

[1]  Otakar Ungerman,et al.  THE IMPACT OF MARKETING INNOVATION ON THE COMPETITIVENESS OF ENTERPRISES IN THE CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY 4.0 , 2018, Journal of Competitiveness.

[2]  A. Payne,et al.  Managing the co-creation of value , 2008 .

[3]  Udo Gottlieb,et al.  Virtual trade shows: Exhibitors' perspectives on virtual marketing capability requirements , 2017, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[4]  D. Madsen The Emergence and Rise of Industry 4.0 Viewed through the Lens of Management Fashion Theory , 2019, Administrative Sciences.

[5]  Adam Lindgreen,et al.  What makes a good case study? A positivist review of qualitative case research published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006 , 2010 .

[6]  G. Easton Critical realism in case study research , 2010 .

[7]  Prakash J. Singh,et al.  Literature Review of Shared Value: A Theoretical Concept or a Management Buzzword? , 2016 .

[8]  Johann Füller,et al.  Co-Creation in Virtual Worlds: The Design of the User Experience , 2011, MIS Q..

[9]  Christoph F. Breidbach,et al.  Technology-enabled value co-creation: An empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices , 2016 .

[10]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[11]  H. Kagermann Change Through Digitization—Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0 , 2015 .

[12]  Risto Rajala,et al.  Theory and practice of value co-creation in B2B systems , 2016 .

[13]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Actors, resources, activities and commitments , 2009 .

[14]  K. Voigt,et al.  Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits and Challenges of Industry 4.0 , 2017, Digital Disruptive Innovation.

[15]  Johanna Gummerus,et al.  Value creation processes and value outcomes in marketing theory , 2013 .

[16]  Enrique Bigné,et al.  Virtual Reality in Marketing: A Framework, Review, and Research Agenda , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Marta Götz,et al.  Clusters and Industry 4.0 – do they fit together? , 2017 .

[18]  Tanya V. Bondarouk,et al.  Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0 , 2020, Administrative Sciences.

[19]  Glyn Lawson,et al.  The Relationship Between Presence and Trust in Virtual Reality , 2016, ECCE.

[20]  David M. Gann,et al.  The Impact of Modelling and Simulation Technology on Engineering Problem Solving , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[21]  Taru Hakanen,et al.  Value co-creation in solution networks , 2013 .

[22]  Susan Spiggle Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research , 1994 .

[23]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market , 2011 .

[24]  Risto Rajala,et al.  Social capital in the growth of science-and-technology-based SMEs , 2008 .

[25]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Virtual and augmented reality: Advancing research in consumer marketing , 2020, International Journal of Research in Marketing.

[26]  Judy Zolkiewski,et al.  Every Cloud Has a Silver Lining - Exploring the Dark Side of Value Co-creation in B2B Service Networks , 2016 .

[27]  Kerimcan Ozcan,et al.  Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications , 2016 .

[28]  G. C. Carrión La calidad en los métodos de investigación cualitativa: principios de aplicación práctica para estudios de casos , 2006 .

[29]  B. Figueiredo,et al.  The Systemic Creation of Value Through Circulation in Collaborative Consumer Networks , 2016 .