A two-diode model regarding the distributed series resistance

The two-diode model is widespread for interpreting dark and illuminated current–voltage characteristics of solar cells, though it does not hold correctly for high current densities due to the distributed character of the series resistance. This is one reason for the fact that fitting the dark and the illuminated characteristic leads to two different sets of two-diode parameters. After locally analyzing a typical multicrystalline solar cell, it is found that here the grid conductivity represents the most significant contribution to the distributed series resistance. A simplified equivalent circuit implying a 1-dimensional current distribution is used for simulating current-dependent effective (lumped) series resistances in the dark and under illumination. It is found that the influence of the distributed series resistance on both characteristics can be described empirically by introducing a series resistance being variable for high currents. Moreover, well-known departures from the superposition principle often cannot be neglected. Therefore the second diode contribution is generally stronger under illumination than in the dark, and also the parallel resistance may be affected. We introduce only one additional series resistance parameter and consider that the second diode parameters and the parallel resistance may be different under illumination and in the dark. In this way, the current dependence of both the dark and the illuminated series resistance can be described with the same consistent set of first diode and series resistance parameters. Based on these findings, a two-diode model with an analytically given variable series resistance is proposed, which may describe both the dark and the illuminated characteristic up to large current densities in good approximation with one and the same physically meaningful parameter set.

[1]  Thorsten Trupke,et al.  Spatially resolved series resistance of silicon solar cells obtained from luminescence imaging , 2007 .

[2]  Wilhelm Warta,et al.  Spatially resolved determination of dark saturation current and series resistance of silicon solar cells , 2010 .

[3]  S. Rein,et al.  Fill factor analysis of solar cells' current–voltage curves , 2010 .

[4]  Otwin Breitenstein,et al.  Influence of Defects on Solar Cell Characteristics , 2009 .

[5]  Otwin Breitenstein,et al.  Evaluation of luminescence images of solar cells for injection-level dependent lifetimes , 2013 .

[6]  Eicke R. Weber,et al.  Fast series resistance imaging for silicon solar cells using electroluminescence , 2009 .

[7]  M. Green,et al.  Spatially resolved analysis and minimization of resistive losses in high-efficiency Si solar cells , 1996 .

[8]  G. L. Araújo,et al.  The effect of distributed series resistance on the dark and illuminated current—Voltage characteristics of solar cells , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[9]  High resolution saturation current density imaging at grain boundaries by lock-in thermography , 2012 .

[10]  M. Green,et al.  Departures from the principle of superposition in silicon solar cells , 1994 .

[11]  David Hinken,et al.  Recombination current and series resistance imaging of solar cells by combined luminescence and lock-in thermography , 2007 .

[12]  T. Fuyuki,et al.  Photographic surveying of minority carrier diffusion length in polycrystalline silicon solar cells by electroluminescence , 2005 .

[13]  M. Saad,et al.  Analysis of multi-crystalline silicon solar cells at low illumination levels using a modified two-diode model , 2010 .

[14]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Reduced fill factors in multicrystalline silicon solar cells due to injection‐level dependent bulk recombination lifetimes , 2000 .

[15]  Martin A. Green,et al.  A new method for accurate measurements of the lumped series resistance of solar cells , 1993, Conference Record of the Twenty Third IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1993 (Cat. No.93CH3283-9).

[16]  Ralf Preu,et al.  Evaluating luminescence based voltage images of silicon solar cells , 2010 .

[17]  O. Breitenstein,et al.  Can Luminescence Imaging Replace Lock-in Thermography on Solar Cells? , 2011, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[18]  Otwin Breitenstein,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of electroluminescence images of solar cells , 2010 .

[19]  C. Sah,et al.  Carrier Generation and Recombination in P-N Junctions and P-N Junction Characteristics , 1957, Proceedings of the IRE.

[20]  Wilhelm Warta,et al.  Efficiency limiting bulk recombination in multicrystalline silicon solar cells , 2012 .

[21]  Andrew Blakers,et al.  Accurate series resistance measurement of solar cells , 2013 .

[22]  Andreas Schenk,et al.  Explanation of commonly observed shunt currents in c-Si solar cells by means of recombination statistics beyond the Shockley-Read-Hall approximation , 2011 .