Chapter 14 – New Developments
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Hays,et al. US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[2] Joshua A Salomon,et al. Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data , 2003, Population health metrics.
[3] Anthony O'Hagan,et al. Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. , 2006, Journal of health economics.
[4] P. Krabbe,et al. Quantification of Health by Scaling Similarity Judgments , 2014, PloS one.
[5] Deborah Cooper,et al. Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology. , 2003, Social science & medicine.
[6] G. H. Fischer,et al. Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints , 1983 .
[7] P. Stalmeier,et al. On the Assessment of Preferences for Health and Duration: Maximal Endurable Time and Better Than Dead Preferences , 2007, Medical care.
[8] Elizabeth Molsen,et al. Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[9] J. Brazier,et al. Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale , 2012, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[10] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data. , 2005, Psychological methods.
[11] J. Brazier,et al. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. , 2012, Journal of health economics.
[12] The Better than Dead Method: Feasibility and Interpretation of a Valuation Study , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.
[13] J. Louviere,et al. Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices , 2005 .
[14] Mark Oppe,et al. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[15] E. Perloff,et al. Clinimetrics and psychometrics work hand in hand. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.
[16] K. Gaebel,et al. PIH39 Eliciting Preferences to the EQ-5D-5L Health States: Discrete Choice Experiment or Multiprofile Case of Best-Worst Scaling , 2012 .
[17] K. Stevens,et al. The use of qualitative methods in developing the descriptive systems of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluation. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[18] J. Kruskal. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .
[19] Michael C. Edwards,et al. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach to Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis , 2010 .
[20] John Brazier,et al. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[21] R. Shepard. Metric structures in ordinal data , 1966 .
[22] N. Boyd,et al. Attitudes Toward Quality of Survival , 1982, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[23] T. Flynn. Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best–worst scaling , 2010, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.
[24] R. Shepard. Circularity in Judgments of Relative Pitch , 1964 .
[25] J. Tenenbaum,et al. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.
[26] Joshua A Salomon,et al. Quantification of Health States with Rank-Based Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[27] J. Cairns,et al. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report. , 2014, Health technology assessment.
[28] R. Hays,et al. Demographic Differences in Health Preferences in the United States , 2014, Medical care.
[29] N. Leidy,et al. Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[30] K. Stevens. How Well Do the Generic Multi-attribute Utility Instruments Incorporate Patient and Public Views Into Their Descriptive Systems? , 2016, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[31] Richard Norman,et al. The Impact of Different DCE-Based Approaches When Anchoring Utility Scores , 2016, PharmacoEconomics.
[32] L. Lamers. The Transformation of Utilities for Health States Worse Than Death: Consequences for the Estimation of EQ-5D Value Sets , 2007, Medical care.
[33] P. Stalmeier,et al. The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. , 2006, Health economics.
[34] G. Fava,et al. Psychometric Theory Is an Obstacle to the Progress of Clinical Research , 2004, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.
[35] R. Shepard. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .
[36] Paul F. M. Krabbe,et al. A Generalized Measurement Model to Quantify Health: The Multi-Attribute Preference Response Model , 2013, PloS one.
[37] J. Brazier,et al. Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample , 2011, Applied health economics and health policy.
[38] J. Kruskal. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .
[39] T. Peters,et al. Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. , 2007, Journal of health economics.
[40] P. Fayers. Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment , 2007, Quality of Life Research.