Influence and Passivity in Social Media

The ever-increasing amount of information flowing through Social Media forces the members of these networks to compete for attention and influence by relying on other people to spread their message. A large study of information propagation within Twitter reveals that the majority of users act as passive information consumers and do not forward the content to the network. Therefore, in order for individuals to become influential they must not only obtain attention and thus be popular, but also overcome user passivity. We propose an algorithm that determines the influence and passivity of users based on their information forwarding activity. An evaluation performed with a 2.5 million user dataset shows that our influence measure is a good predictor of URL clicks, outperforming several other measures that do not explicitly take user passivity into account. We demonstrate that high popularity does not necessarily imply high influence and vice-versa.

[1]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999, SODA '98.

[2]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Information flow in social groups , 2003, cond-mat/0305305.

[3]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Learning influence probabilities in social networks , 2010, WSDM '10.

[5]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[6]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Identifying the influential bloggers in a community , 2008, WSDM '08.

[7]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[9]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009 .

[10]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[11]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Outtweeting the Twitterers - Predicting Information Cascades in Microblogs , 2010, WOSN.

[12]  Fang Wu,et al.  Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope , 2008, First Monday.

[13]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[15]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[16]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.