Decontamination of Pig Carcasses Using Water Pressure and Lactic Acid

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different water pressures and concentrations of lactic acid on microbial counts (mesophilic bacteria, enterobacteria and Salmonella) on pig carcasses without contamination and contaminated carcasses, before and after the last shower and before being cooled. The tests were carried out using 4, 3 and 2 bar water pressure, and 2, 1 and 0% lactic acid concentration. In general, both the pressure in the shower and lactic acid had a positive effect by reducing the microbial count. The interaction between the pressure and lactic acid caused the largest reduction in carcasses surface count for mesophiles. With regard to enterobacteria on contaminated carcasses, the most important variable was the lactic acid concentration and in uncontaminated carcasses, it was water pressure. The use of 8 bar pressure of the wash water without lactic acid caused a reduction in mesophilic bacteria and enterobacteria, for both the contaminated and uncontaminated carcasses, with results statistically equal to each other, and significantly lower than the initial counts. The water pressure at 8 bar reduced the percentage of carcasses with Salmonella in contaminated carcasses.

[1]  E. Valduga,et al.  The Effect of Water Pressure and Chlorine Concentration on Microbiological Characteristics of Spray Washed Broiler Carcasses , 2013 .

[2]  F. Smulders,et al.  The potential of the combined application of hot water sprays and steam condensation at subatmospheric pressure for decontaminating inoculated pig skin and muscle surfaces , 2012 .

[3]  C. Gill Effects on the microbiological condition of product of decontaminating treatments routinely applied to carcasses at beef packing plants. , 2009, Journal of food protection.

[4]  J. Oliveira,et al.  Pesquisa de Salmonella spp. e microrganismos indicadores em carcaças de frango e água de tanques de pré-resfriamento em abatedouro de aves , 2007 .

[5]  R. Stephan,et al.  Microbiological contamination of pig carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two European Union-approved abattoirs. , 2006, Journal of food protection.

[6]  F. Villani,et al.  Changes in the Spoilage-Related Microbiota of Beef during Refrigerated Storage under Different Packaging Conditions , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  Milan Houška,et al.  Decontamination of pork carcasses by steam and lactic acid , 2006 .

[8]  J. Sheridan,et al.  Studies to determine the critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point systems. , 2004, International journal of food microbiology.

[9]  M. Ghoul,et al.  Influence of high pressure on the color and microbial quality of beef meat , 2003 .

[10]  J. M. Fresno,et al.  Study of Enterobacteriaceae during the manufacture and ripening of San Simón cheese , 2001 .

[11]  C. Gill,et al.  Evaluation of the hygienic performances of the processes for cleaning, dressing and cooling pig carcasses at eight packing plants. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[12]  J. Sheridan,et al.  The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir , 2000, Letters in applied microbiology.

[13]  D. Mossel,et al.  MICROBIAL CHANGES ON FRESHLY SLAUGHTERED PORK CARCASSES DUE TO “HOT” LACTIC ACID DECONTAMINATION , 1997 .

[14]  Martin M. Schumacher Experimental design in biotechnology, by Perry D. Haaland : Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989, xv + 259 pages, price US$ 89.75, ISBNO-8247-7881-2 , 1992 .

[15]  P. Haaland Experimental Design in Biotechnology , 1989 .

[16]  R. E. Buchanan,et al.  Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. , 1975 .

[17]  S. T. Cowan Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology , 1948, Nature.