Adolescent Self-Concept: Testing the Assumption of Equivalent Structure Across Gender

This study tested the invariance of a multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept (SC) structure for adolescent males and females. In a covariance structure analysis of data from a sample of 832 (412 males, 420 females) grade 11 and 12 students, with multiple measures of general, academic, English, and mathematics SC facets, SC structure differed for males and females. Although the number of SC factors, pattern of factor loadings (except for one), and hierarchical structure were invariant across gender, relations among the factors differed. These structural differences derived largely from the differential way in which English and mathematics SC related to the other SC facets, and to grades, for each sex. In addition, significant gender differences were found in the reliability of certain measurement scales, and correlated errors of measurement were more prevalent for males than for females. The study has important implications for substantive research that focuses on the comparison of SCs across groups and, in particular, across gender.

[1]  J. Meece,et al.  Sex Differences in Math Achievement: Toward a Model of Academic Choice. , 1982 .

[2]  H. Marsh,et al.  Self-Description Questionnaire: Age and sex effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children. , 1984 .

[3]  B. Byrne,et al.  On Gender Differences in the Structure of Adolescent Self Concept. , 1986 .

[4]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Multidimensional Adolescent Self-Concepts: Their Relationship to Age, Sex, and Academic Measures , 1985 .

[5]  B. Byrne,et al.  On the Structure of Adolescent Self-Concept. , 1986 .

[6]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: cause or effect of academic achievement? , 1977, Journal of educational psychology.

[7]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[8]  C. M. Kubiniec.  The Relative Efficacy of Various Dimensions of the Self-Concept in Predicting Academic Achievement , 1970 .

[9]  Claes Fornell,et al.  Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Comment , 1983 .

[10]  K. Jöreskog.  Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests , 1971 .

[11]  B. Byrne.  The General/Academic Self-Concept Nomological Network: A Review of Construct Validation Research , 1984 .

[12]  H. Marsh,et al.  Multidimensional Self-Concepts: Relations with Sex and Academic Achievement. , 1985 .

[13]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: The Interplay of Theory and Methods. , 1982 .

[14]  G. Maruyama,et al.  Self-esteem and educational achievement: Independent constructs with a common cause? , 1981 .

[15]  Barbara M. Byrne.  Investigating Measures of Self-Concept. , 1983 .

[16]  Nina L. Colwill,et al.  The psychology of sex differences , 1978 .

[17]  L. Primavera,et al.  The Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Academic Achievement: An Investigation of Sex Differences. , 1974 .

[18]  J Sherman.  Mathematics, spatial visualization, and related factors: changes in girls and boys, grades 8-11. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[19]  J. G. Jones,et al.  Measures of Self-Perception as Predictors of Scholastic Achievement. , 1970 .

[20]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relationship Between Self and Achievement/Performance Measures , 1982 .

[21]  B. Byrne.  Self-concept/academic achievement relations: an investigation of dimensionality, stability and causality , 1986 .

[22]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations , 1976 .

[23]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[24]  Jay Magidson,et al.  Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models , 1979 .

[25]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[26]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Factor analysis and measurement in sociological research : a multi-dimensional perspective , 1981 .

[27]  H. Marsh,et al.  Self-concept: Reliability, stability, dimensionality, validity, and the measurement of change. , 1983 .

[28]  B. Muthén,et al.  Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models , 1977 .

[29]  James C. Anderson,et al.  On the Meaning of Within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors , 1984 .

[30]  J. Fleming,et al.  The dimensionality of self-esteem. II: Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales , 1984 .

[31]  G. E. Deitz.  The development of self-concept during adolescence and its relationship to adjustment. , 1970 .

[32]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  General Self-Concept, Self-Concept of Academic Ability and School Achievement: Implications for “Causes” of Self-Concept , 1980 .

[33]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  "Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis": A further comment. , 1983 .

[34]  J. Hoelter.  The Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1983 .

[35]  R. Wylie,et al.  Theory and research on selected topics , 1979 .

[36]  K. Deaux.  From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade's research on gender , 1984 .

[37]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Mathematics Learning and the Sexes: A Review. , 1974 .

[38]  E. Fennema,et al.  Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors , 1977 .

[39]  J. S. Long.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Preface to Lisrel , 1983 .

[40]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: Its Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure , 1985 .

[41]  D. J. Lee.  Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[42]  R. Wylie,et al.  The Self Concept , 1962 .

[43]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. , 1984 .