Minimally invasive direct redo coronary artery bypass grafting.

Redo coronary artery bypass grafting due to graft failure and the progression of new lesions has been increasing in frequency recently. We are often forced to revascularize only the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in very elderly patients with a high risk to median sternotomy. We performed reoperative minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCABG) in seven patients. The target sites were as follows: LAD, 7; first diagonal branch, 1; and the graft material was the left internal thoracic artery (LITA), 7; and saphenous vein graft (SVG), 1. Complete revascularization was accomplished in all patients, by including hybrid therapy in three patients and axillo-coronary bypass grafting with SVGs in two patients. Postoperative angiography showed all patent grafts and all patients were discharged. During a mean follow-up period of 2.4 years (range: 0.5 to 3.5 years), all were free from cardiac events, except for one patient who had recurrent angina due to failure of a previously patent graft 3 years after redo MIDCAB. These results suggest that MIDCABG via left antero-lateral thoracotomy is an effective and safe technique in redo cases, as well as an alternative procedure for hybrid revascularization that combines minimally invasive revascularization of LAD with additional catheter interventional therapy.

[1]  M. Mariani,et al.  Reoperative coronary bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass through a small thoracotomy. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  K. Miyaji,et al.  Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for redo patients. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  J. Christenson,et al.  Reoperative coronary artery bypass procedures: risk factors for early mortality and late survival. , 1997, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[4]  A. Barsotti,et al.  Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  C M Gibson,et al.  Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  A. Haverich,et al.  Follow-up experience with coronary hybrid-revascularisation. , 2000, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[7]  P. Goldschmidt-Clermont,et al.  Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting. , 2001, American heart journal.

[8]  T. Bowker,et al.  Differential restenosis rate of individual coronary artery sites after multivessel angioplasty: implications for revascularization strategy. CABRI Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation. , 1998, American heart journal.

[9]  G. Dangas,et al.  One-Year Clinical Outcome After Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass , 2000, Circulation.

[10]  H. Itaya,et al.  [Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass]. , 1998, The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official publication of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery = Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai zasshi.