Supporting Information ( SI ) for “ Toward link predictability of complex networks ”

If the adjacency matrix contains degenerate eigenvalues, we must modify the approach using non-degenerate eigenvalues. We denote the eigenvalues as λki, where the index k runs over different eigenvalues and the index i runs over M associated eigenvectors of the same eigenvalue. Note that there is no unique way of choosing a basis for the eigenvectors of the unperturbed network since any linear combination of the eigenvectors belonging to the same eigenvalue is still an eigenvector. Repeated eigenvalues have been shown to be related to the symmetric motifs and graph automorphisms in networks [1]. After a perturbation is added to the network, the symmetry of the nodes will be lifted either partly or completely, so the degenerate eigenvalues must be chosen such that they can be transformed continuously into the perturbed non-degenerate eigenvalues. If we define the chosen eigenvectors to be x̄ki = ∑M j=1 βkjxkj , the eigenfunction becomes ( A +∆A ) x̄ki = ( λki +∆λ̄ki ) x̄ki, (1)

[1]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook , 2009, WOSN '09.

[2]  Rubén J. Sánchez-García,et al.  Spectral characteristics of network redundancy. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Sampling from large graphs , 2006, KDD '06.

[4]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  J. Leskovec,et al.  Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters , 2006, TKDD.

[6]  A. Arenas,et al.  Community detection in complex networks using extremal optimization. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Yiming Yang,et al.  The Enron Corpus: A New Dataset for Email Classi(cid:12)cation Research , 2004 .

[8]  R. Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Generation of uncorrelated random scale-free networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Pablo M. Gleiser,et al.  Community Structure in Jazz , 2003, Adv. Complex Syst..

[10]  D. Bu,et al.  Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  A. Arenas,et al.  Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measuring ISP topologies with rocketfuel , 2002, TNET.

[13]  M. Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[14]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[15]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[16]  Jonathan L. Herlocker,et al.  Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems , 2004, TOIS.