Relative subjective count and assessment of interruptive technologies applied to mobile monitoring of stress

A variety of technologies-from agents designed to assist or encourage you, to context-based messaging services-have the opportunity to interrupt you many times throughout the day. One of the challenges with designing new highly interruptive technologies is how to objectively assess their influence on human experience. This paper presents an assessment of a new mobile system that interrupts the wearer to support self-monitoring of stress. We utilize a diverse set of assessment techniques, including a newly proposed measure, relative subjective count, which compares the difference in perceived number of interruptions to actual number of interruptions. This measure, together with direct and indirect subjective reports, and a behavioral choice, is used to evaluate an empathetic version of the mobile system vs. a non-empathetic version. We found that post-experience direct questionnaire assessments such as ''how stressful has using the system been?'' do not significantly distinguish user experiences with the two systems; however, the new measure of relative subjective count, the behavioral choice, and another indirect questioning strategy, do point toward a preference for the empathetic system.

[1]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  A diary study of task switching and interruptions , 2004, CHI.

[2]  A. Manley.  Physical Activity And Health: A Report Of The Surgeon General , 2004 .

[3]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Exertion Interfaces for Sports Over a Distance , 2002 .

[4]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Subjective Duration Assessment: An Implicit Probe for Software Usability , 2001 .

[5]  Stefan Agamanolis,et al.  Exertion interfaces: sports over a distance for social bonding and fun , 2003, CHI '03.

[6]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  Affective wearables , 1997, Digest of Papers. First International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[7]  David R Bassett,et al.  Validity of the simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique for measuring energy expenditure. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  D. Dubin.  Rapid Interpretation of EKG's , 1977 .

[9]  J. Mcanulty,et al.  CARDIOVASCULAR PHYSIOLOGY , 1981, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Kent Larson,et al.  Tools for Studying Behavior and Technology in Natural Settings , 2003, UbiComp.

[11]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  THE EMPATHIC COMPANION: A CHARACTER-BASED INTERFACE THAT ADDRESSES USERS' AFFECTIVE STATES , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[12]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[13]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures , 1996, Pain.

[14]  Youngme Moon,et al.  This Computer Responds to User Frustration Theory, Design, Results, and Implications , 2002 .

[15]  Robert M. Sapolsky,et al.  Why zebras don't get ulcers : an updated guide to stress, stress-related diseases, and coping , 1994 .

[16]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Learning and reasoning about interruption , 2003, ICMI '03.

[17]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Evaluating affective interactions: Alternatives to asking what users feel , 2005 .

[18]  B. McEwen,et al.  Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological Momentary Assessment (Ema) in Behavioral Medicine , 1994 .

[20]  Karen Kay-Lynn Liu,et al.  A personal, mobile system for understanding stress and interruptions , 2004 .

[21]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[22]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study , 2003, CHI '03.

[23]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models of attention in computing and communication , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[24]  Ling Bao,et al.  A context-aware experience sampling tool , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .