Numerical homogenization on approach for stokesian suspensions.

In this technical report we investigate efficient methods for numerical simulation of active suspensions. The prototypical system is a suspension of swimming bacteria in a Newtonian fluid. Rheological and other macroscopic properties of such suspensions can differ dramatically from the same properties of the suspending fluid alone or of suspensions of similar but inactive particles. Elongated bacteria, such as E. coli or B. subtilis, swim along their principal axis, propelling themselves with the help of flagella, attached at the anterior of the organism and pushing it forward in the manner of a propeller. They interact hydrodynamically with the surrounding fluid and, because of their asymmetrical shape, have the propensity to align with the local flow. This, along with the dipolar nature of bacteria (the two forces a bacterium exerts on a fluid - one due to self-propulsion and the other opposing drag - have equal magnitude and point in opposite directions), causes nearby bacteria to tend to align, resulting in a intermittent local ordering on the mesoscopic scale, which is between the microscopic scale of an individual bacterium and the macroscopic scale of the suspension (e.g., its container). The local ordering is sometimes called a collective mode or collective swimming. Thanks to self-propulsion, collective modes inject momentum into the fluid in a coherent way. This enhances the local strain rate without changing the macroscopic stress applied at the boundary of the container. The macroscopic effective viscosity of the suspension is defined roughly as the ratio of the applied stress to the bulk strain rate. If local alignment and therefore local strain-rate enhancement, are significant, the effective viscosity can be appreciably lower than that of the corresponding passive suspension or even of the surrounding fluid alone. Indeed, a sevenfold decrease in the effective viscosity was observed in experiments with B. subtilis. More generally, local collective swimming resulting from bacterial alignment can significantly alter other macroscopic properties of the suspension, such as the oxygen diffusivity and mixing rates. In order to understand the unique macroscopic properties of active suspensions the connection between microscopic swimming and alignment dynamics and the mesoscopic pattern formation must be clarified. This is difficult to do analytically in the fully general setting of moderately dense suspensions, because of the large number of bacteria involved (approx. 10{sup 10} cm{sup -3} in experiments) and the complex, time-dependent geometry of the system. Many reduced analytical models of bacterial have been proposed, but all of them require validation. While comparison with experiment is the ultimate test of a model's fidelity, it is difficult to conduct experiments matched to these models assumptions. Numerical simulation of the microscopic dynamics is an acceptable substitute, but it runs into the problem of having to discretize the fluid domain with a fine-grained boundary (the bacteria) and update the discretization as the domain evolves (bacteria move). This leads to a prohibitively high number of degrees of freedom and prohibitively high setup costs per timestep of simulation. In this technical report we propose numerical methods designed to alleviate these two difficulties. We indicate how to (1) construct an optimal discretization in terms of the number of degrees of freedom per digit of accuracy and (2) optimally update the discretization as the simulation evolves. The technical tool here is the derivation of rigorous error bounds on the error in the numerical solution when using our proposed discretization at the initial time as well as after a given elapsed simulation time. These error bounds should guide the construction of practical discretization schemes and update strategies. Our initial construction is carried out by using a theoretically convenient, but practically prohibitive spectral basis, which is a Galerkin basis of functions with global support. At the end of this report we propose localization techniques while maintaining acceptable error bounds. No numerical experiments were conducted as part of this study, but we envision that we may undertake such studies and further development of the method, jointly or individually.

[1]  Jeffrey S. Guasto,et al.  Dynamics of enhanced tracer diffusion in suspensions of swimming eukaryotic microorganisms. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[2]  Joseph Watkins,et al.  Organized Cell Swimming Motions in Bacillus subtilis Colonies: Patterns of Short-Lived Whirls and Jets , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  I. Aranson,et al.  Viscosity of bacterial suspensions: hydrodynamic interactions and self-induced noise. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Thomas E Mallouk,et al.  Schooling behavior of light-powered autonomous micromotors in water. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  H. Chaté,et al.  Onset of collective and cohesive motion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[6]  John W. Roberts,et al.  Collective Bacterial Dynamics Revealed Using a Three-Dimensional Population-Scale Defocused Particle Tracking Technique , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  R. Temam Navier-Stokes Equations and Nonlinear Functional Analysis , 1987 .

[8]  Salima Rafaï,et al.  Effective viscosity of microswimmer suspensions. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[9]  Takuji Ishikawa,et al.  Coherent structures in monolayers of swimming particles. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[10]  Andrey Sokolov,et al.  Enhanced mixing and spatial instability in concentrated bacterial suspensions. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Leonid Berlyand,et al.  Effective viscosity of bacterial suspensions: a three-dimensional PDE model with stochastic torque. , 2011 .

[12]  A. Libchaber,et al.  Particle diffusion in a quasi-two-dimensional bacterial bath. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[13]  G. Prokert,et al.  Existence results for the quasistationary motion of a free capillary liquid drop , 1996 .

[14]  Andrey Sokolov,et al.  Reduction of viscosity in suspension of swimming bacteria. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[15]  Michael J Shelley,et al.  Orientational order and instabilities in suspensions of self-locomoting rods. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[16]  I. Tuval,et al.  Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. J. Kim,et al.  Enhanced diffusion due to motile bacteria , 2004 .

[18]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Spontaneously ordered motion of self-propelled particles , 1997, cond-mat/0611741.

[19]  Sriram Ramaswamy,et al.  Rheology of active-particle suspensions. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[20]  On the approximation of the spectrum of the Stokes operator , 1989 .

[21]  T. Thomas Extended Compatibility Conditions for the Study of Surfaces of Discontinuity in Continuum Mechanics , 1957 .

[22]  M. Graham,et al.  Transport and collective dynamics in suspensions of confined swimming particles. , 2005, Physical Review Letters.

[23]  B. Mercier,et al.  Eigenvalue approximation by mixed and hybrid methods , 1981 .

[24]  Patrick T. Underhill,et al.  Diffusion and spatial correlations in suspensions of swimming particles. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[25]  T J Pedley,et al.  A new continuum model for suspensions of gyrotactic micro-organisms , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  I. Aranson,et al.  Concentration dependence of the collective dynamics of swimming bacteria. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[27]  R. Cortez,et al.  Fluid dynamics of self-propelled microorganisms, from individuals to concentrated populations , 2007 .

[28]  Leonid Berlyand,et al.  Effective viscosity of dilute bacterial suspensions: a two-dimensional model , 2008, Physical biology.

[29]  T. Ishikawa,et al.  Diffusion of swimming model micro-organisms in a semi-dilute suspension , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[31]  H. Swinney,et al.  Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  D. Saintillan Extensional rheology of active suspensions. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Min Jun Kim,et al.  Use of bacterial carpets to enhance mixing in microfluidic systems , 2007 .

[34]  Ignacio Pagonabarraga,et al.  Dynamic regimes of hydrodynamically coupled self-propelling particles , 2006 .

[35]  Jonathon Howard,et al.  A Self-Organized Vortex Array of Hydrodynamically Entrained Sperm Cells , 2005, Science.

[36]  Pavel Grinfeld,et al.  Hadamard’s Formula Inside and Out , 2010 .

[37]  On the comparison of the Dirichlet and Neumann counting functions , 2008, 0812.2554.

[38]  Leonid Berlyand,et al.  Three-dimensional model for the effective viscosity of bacterial suspensions. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  David Saintillan,et al.  The Dilute Rheology of Swimming Suspensions: A Simple Kinetic Model , 2010 .

[40]  R. Courant,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1962 .