Rapid response surface creation method to optimize window geometry using dynamic daylighting simulation and energy simulation

Abstract Window geometries have significant impacts on building performance. Thus, simulation-based decision support during the early stages of building design is in high demand. Building designs are multi-objective optimization processes in which unquantified values, such as the design preferences of architects or clients, are included as objective functions along with building performance. In this context, showing architects the response surface between window geometries and building performance is useful for their decision making. This study proposes a procedure for creating a response surface in a feasible manner. In the procedure, the number of dynamic daylighting simulations is reduced by creating a link between the daylight factor (DF) and daylight autonomy (DA). In addition, the procedure allows for the estimation of electric lighting energy savings with high resolution by integrating dynamic daylighting simulation tools into energy simulation tools. In the case studies, DAYSIM and EnergyPlus are used to create the response surfaces. The impact of COPs for the cooling and heating systems on the features of the response surface can be easily analyzed. Higher COP results in a narrower selectable design range in cases where the same percentage of acceptable ranges for building performance degradation is employed (from 30–100% to 60–100%). The method was validated with detailed simulation outputs. The error caused by the proposed procedure (below 1%) was negligible compared with the error caused by the selection of the daylight simulation algorithm (approximately 5%).

[1]  Roberta Padovan,et al.  Multi-criteria energy and daylighting optimization for an office with fixed and moveable shading devices , 2014 .

[2]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design , 2006 .

[3]  Karen Kensek,et al.  EARLY DESIGN ANALYSIS USING OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES IN DESIGN/PRACTICE , 2014 .

[4]  Jérôme Henri Kämpf,et al.  Building shape optimisation to reduce air-conditioning needs using constrained evolutionary algorithms , 2015 .

[5]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  A New Technique for Computer Simulation of Illuminated Spaces , 1988 .

[6]  Shady Attia,et al.  Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design , 2012 .

[7]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Designing-in performance: A framework for evolutionary energy performance feedback in early stage design , 2014 .

[8]  Philippe Rigo,et al.  A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis , 2014 .

[9]  Shinsuke Kato,et al.  Structural analysis of Pareto-optimal solution sets for multi-objective optimization: An application to outer window design problems using Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithms , 2010 .

[10]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds , 2001 .

[11]  Daniel E. Fisher,et al.  EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program , 2001 .

[12]  Mario Sassone,et al.  The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis , 2015 .

[13]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Envelope-related energy demand: A design indicator of energy performance for residential buildings in early design stages , 2013 .

[14]  Svetlana Olbina,et al.  Validation of building energy modeling tools: Ecotect™, Green Building Studio™ and IES™ , 2012, Proceedings Title: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[15]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Daylighting simulation in the DOE-2 building energy analysis program , 1985 .

[16]  Kenneth W. Bauer,et al.  Response surface methodology as a sensitivity analysis tool in decision analysis , 1999 .

[17]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: Integrating architectural design systems and energy simulation , 2013 .

[18]  J. Virgone,et al.  Design of buildings shape and energetic consumption , 2001 .

[19]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .