Quality Assessment of DSMs Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning

High-resolution Digital Surface Models (DSMs) from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) imagery with accuracy better than 10 cm open new possibilities in geosciences and engineering. The accuracy of such DSMs depends on the number and distribution of ground control points (GCPs). Placing and measuring GCPs are often the most time-consuming on-site tasks in a UAV project. Safety or accessibility concerns may impede their proper placement, so either costlier techniques must be used, or a less accurate DSM is obtained. Photogrammetric blocks flown by drones with on-board receivers capable of RTK (real-time kinematic) positioning do not need GCPs, as camera stations at exposure time can be determined with cm-level accuracy, and used to georeference the block and control its deformations. This paper presents an experimental investigation on the repeatability of DSM generation from several blocks acquired with a RTK-enabled drone, where differential corrections were sent from a local master station or a network of Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS). Four different flights for each RTK mode were executed over a test field, according to the same flight plan. DSM generation was performed with three block control configurations: GCP only, camera stations only, and with camera stations and one GCP. The results show that irrespective of the RTK mode, the first and third configurations provide the best DSM inner consistency. The average range of the elevation discrepancies among the DSMs in such cases is about 6 cm (2.5 GSD, ground sampling density) for a 10-cm resolution DSM. Using camera stations only, the average range is almost twice as large (4.7 GSD). The average DSM accuracy, which was verified on checkpoints, turned out to be about 2.1 GSD with the first and third configurations, and 3.7 GSD with camera stations only.

[1]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Testing Accuracy and Repeatability of UAV Blocks Oriented with GNSS-Supported Aerial Triangulation , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Carlos Castillo,et al.  Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry - merits, limits and developments , 2016 .

[3]  Roland Bless,et al.  Network Design , 2011, 4WARD Project.

[4]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  INTEGRATED SENSOR ORIENTATION - AN OEEPE TEST , 2000 .

[5]  K. Oost,et al.  Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on Structure-from-Motion algorithms , 2016 .

[6]  Christophe Delacourt,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of High Resolution Digital Surface Models Computed by PhotoScan® and MicMac® in Sub-Optimal Survey Conditions , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[7]  A. Dégre,et al.  The evaluation of unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning to generate DEMs of agricultural watersheds , 2014 .

[8]  Miao Yu,et al.  Modeling of landslide topography based on micro-unmanned aerial vehicle photography and structure-from-motion , 2017, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[9]  G. Forlani,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems and DSM matching for rock glacier monitoring , 2017 .

[10]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[11]  Dimitrios Zekkos,et al.  COMPARISON OF UAV-ENABLED PHOTOGRAMMETRY-BASED 3D POINT CLOUDS AND INTERPOLATED DSMs OF SLOPING TERRAIN FOR ROCKFALL HAZARD ANALYSIS , 2016 .

[12]  S. M. Jong,et al.  High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014 .

[13]  S. Robson,et al.  Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment , 2016 .

[14]  M. Cramer,et al.  UAV CAMERAS: OVERVIEW AND GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION BENCHMARK , 2017 .

[15]  J. Chandler,et al.  Minimising systematic error surfaces in digital elevation models using oblique convergent imagery , 2011 .

[16]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography , 2014 .

[17]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  The Impact of the Calibration Method on the Accuracy of Point Clouds Derived Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Multi-View Stereopsis , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[18]  F. Agüera-Vega,et al.  Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle , 2017 .

[19]  Menna,et al.  ACCURACY AND BLOCK DEFORMATION ANALYSIS IN AUTOMATIC UAV AND TERRESTRIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY – LESSON LEARNT – , 2013 .

[20]  S. Robson,et al.  3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys , 2017 .

[21]  E. Honkavaara,et al.  GPS SUPPORTED AERIAL TRIANGULATION USING UNTARGETED GROUND CONTROL , 2007 .

[22]  Charles Bielders,et al.  Can DEM time series produced by UAV be used to quantify diffuse erosion in an agricultural watershed , 2017 .

[23]  Markus Gerke,et al.  Accuracy analysis of photogrammetric UAV image blocks: influence of onboard RTK-GNSS and cross flight patterns , 2016 .

[24]  Livio Pinto,et al.  Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images , 2014, Earth Science Informatics.

[25]  D. Stallmann,et al.  SYSTEM CALIBRATION FOR DIRECT GEOREFERENCING , 2002 .

[26]  Changchang Wu,et al.  Critical Configurations for Radial Distortion Self-Calibration , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[27]  N. Haala,et al.  DIRECT GEOREFERENCING USING GPS/INERTIAL EXTERIOR ORIENTATIONS FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[28]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[29]  K. Kraus.  Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans , 2007 .

[30]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system , 2014 .

[31]  J. Travelletti,et al.  UAV-BASED REMOTE SENSING OF LANDSLIDES , 2010 .

[32]  M. Piras,et al.  Performance of low-cost GNSS receiver for landslides monitoring: test and results , 2015 .

[33]  M. Santise.  UAS photogrammetric blocks: accuracy, georeferencing and control , 2016 .

[34]  Christian Heipke,et al.  UAV-based photogrammetry: monitoring of a building zone , 2014 .

[35]  Dieter Fritsch,et al.  Direct Geocoding - is Aerial Triangulation Obsolete? , 1999 .

[36]  D. Passoni,et al.  Using a fixed-wing UAS to map snow depth distribution: an evaluation at peak accumulation , 2016 .

[37]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Spatial Accuracy of UAV-Derived Orthoimagery and Topography: Comparing Photogrammetric Models Processed with Direct Geo-Referencing and Ground Control Points , 2016 .

[38]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[39]  Marco Dubbini,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for High-Resolution Reconstruction of Topography: The Structure from Motion Approach on Coastal Environments , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[40]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Time Series Analysis of Landslide Dynamics Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Jan Skaloud,et al.  FIXED-WING MICRO AERIAL VEHICLE FOR ACCURATE CORRIDOR MAPPING , 2015 .

[42]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[43]  J. Lutes,et al.  DIRECT GEOREFERENCING ON SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL PLATFORMS FOR IMPROVED RELIABILITY AND ACCURACY OF MAPPING WITHOUT THE NEED FOR GROUND CONTROL POINTS , 2015 .

[44]  Rongjun Qin,et al.  An Object-Based Hierarchical Method for Change Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[45]  CrydermanChris,et al.  EVALUATION OF UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ACCURACY FOR MAPPING AND EARTHWORKS COMPUTATIONS , 2014 .