Accuracy of the computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial deformity: A pilot study.

PURPOSE Current surgical planning methods are usually not adequate for the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial (CMF) deformities. To this end, we have developed a 3-dimensional (3D) computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) planning method for the treatment of patients with complex CMF deformities. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the accuracy of this technique in the treatment of patients with complex CMF deformities. PATIENTS AND METHODS Five patients with complex CMF deformities were enrolled. Surgeries were planned with the CASS planning method. Surgical plans were transferred to patients at the time of surgery via computer-generated splints. After surgery, outcome evaluation was completed by first superimposing the postoperative computed tomography (CT) model onto the planned model, and then measuring the differences between planned and actual outcomes. The criteria used to determine the accuracy of the technique were as follows: a linear difference between planned and actual outcomes of less than 2 mm, and an angular difference of less than 4 degrees . RESULTS All patients underwent surgery as planned. With the use of CASS planning, medians of the differences between planned and actual postoperative outcomes were limited to 0.9 mm and 1.7 degrees . CONCLUSION The results of this pilot study are promising. They will be used as the basis of calculations needed to determine the sample size for a larger and more comprehensive study that will be undertaken to assess the accuracy of CASS planning methods.

[1]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  David M Sarver,et al.  The predictability of maxillary repositioning in LeFort I orthognathic surgery. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  N Samman,et al.  Three-dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. , 2000, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[6]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  The precision of computer-generated surgical splints. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[7]  L. Kaban,et al.  Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. , 1997, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  Three-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery. , 2005, Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[9]  G. Santler,et al.  The Graz hemisphere splint: a new precise, non-invasive method of replacing the dental arch of 3D-models by plaster models. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[10]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[11]  R Kikinis,et al.  Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  A. Hildreth,et al.  Surgical accuracy in Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[14]  M S Cooke,et al.  Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls. , 1994, European journal of orthodontics.

[15]  O Donatsky,et al.  Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback. , 1997, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.