How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines

Research supports the central role cognitive strategies can play in successful concept generation by individual designers. Design heuristics have been shown to facilitate the creation of new design concepts in the early, conceptual stage of the design process, as well as throughout the development of ideas. However, we know relatively little about their use in differing disciplines. This study examined evidence of design heuristic use in a protocol study with 12 mechanical engineers and 12 industrial designers who worked individually to develop multiple concepts. The open-ended design problem was for a novel product, and the designers’ sketches and comments were recorded as they worked on the problem for 25 min and in a retrospective interview. The results showed frequent use of design heuristics in both disciplines and a significant relationship to the rated creativity of the concepts. Though industrial designers used more heuristics in their concepts, there was a high degree of similarity in heuristic use. Some differences between design disciplines were observed in the choice of design heuristics, where industrial designers showed a greater emphasis on user experience, environmental contexts, and added features. These findings demonstrate the prevalence of design heuristics in individual concept generation and their effectiveness in generating creative concepts, across two design domains.

[1]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Cognitive Heuristics Employed by Design Experts A Case Study , 2009 .

[2]  Colleen M. Seifert,et al.  Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design , 2011 .

[3]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Cognitive heuristics in design: Instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[4]  Karen M. Bursic,et al.  Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes , 1998 .

[5]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Design heuristics support two modes of idea generation: Initiating ideas and transitioning among concepts , 2012 .

[6]  Anne Bruseberg,et al.  Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers' feedback. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[8]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  Transforming shape in design: observations from studies of sketching , 2009 .

[9]  P Eric,et al.  Concept Mapping: a Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship Between Concepts , 1997 .

[10]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  A Case-Study Analysis of Design Heuristics in an Upper-Level Cross-Disciplinary Design Course , 2014 .

[11]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[12]  Michael G. Oliva,et al.  Making The Strange Familiar: Creativity and the Future of Engineering Education , 2004 .

[13]  D. Hantula.  Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2001 .

[14]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Predictive Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 1972 .

[15]  Min Basadur,et al.  Measuring Preference for Ideation in Creative Problem-Solving Training , 1983 .

[16]  Belkis Uluoǧlu,et al.  Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques , 2000 .

[17]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[18]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Traditional studying for examination versus constructivist learning tasks: Do learning outcomes differ? , 1998 .

[19]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Structured and opportunistic processing in design: a critical discussion , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  H. Scott Fogler,et al.  Strategies for Creative Problem Solving , 1994 .

[21]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Future of Engineering Education: Part 2. Teaching Methods That Work. , 2000 .

[22]  Colleen M. Seifert,et al.  COGNITIVE HEURISTICS IN DESIGN IDEATION , 2010 .

[23]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation , 2012 .

[24]  John Christopher Jones,et al.  Design methods: Seeds of human futures , 1970 .

[25]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION II. TEACHING METHODS THAT WORK , 2000 .

[26]  Ian Dennis,et al.  Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study , 1994 .

[27]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  How do Design Heuristics Affects Outcomes , 2012 .

[28]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Teaching Design to Freshmen: Style and Content , 1994 .

[29]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Assessing Design Heuristics for Idea Generation in an Introductory Engineering Course , 2012 .

[30]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses , 2014 .

[31]  Stephen W. Brown,et al.  DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS: ADVANTAGES IN CONSUMER MARKETING SETTINGS , 1986 .

[32]  Madara Ogot,et al.  Engineering Design: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[33]  A. W. Court,et al.  Improving Creativity in Engineering Design Education , 1998 .

[34]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[35]  Altshuller.  Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[36]  C.J. Atman,et al.  Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.

[37]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design , 2016 .

[38]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[39]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[40]  John S. Gero,et al.  The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers , 2002 .

[41]  Colleen M. Seifert,et al.  DESIGN HEURISTICS IN IDEATION ACROSS ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN DOMAINS , 2010 .

[42]  David G. Ullman,et al.  A comparison of the results of empirical studies into the mechanical design process , 1988 .

[43]  Robin Adams,et al.  What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals' Experiences , 2012 .

[44]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[45]  T. M. Amabile.  Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[46]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Design protocol data and novel design decisions , 1995 .

[47]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Creativity in Design Engineering and the Role of Knowledge: Modelling the Expert , 2005 .

[48]  N. Cross.  The Expertise of Exceptional Designers , 2003 .

[49]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Cognitive Heuristic Use In Engineering Design Ideation , 2010 .

[50]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Teaching Design Ideation , 2011 .

[51]  J. Cusack.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1994 .

[52]  Robert Phaal,et al.  A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice , 2013 .

[53]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[54]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Can experienced designers learn from new tools? A case study of idea generation in a professional engineering team , 2014 .

[55]  H. Mirels,et al.  FLUENCY AS A PERVASIVE ELEMENT IN THE MEASUREMENT OF CREATIVITY1 , 1970 .

[56]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  Discovering the design problem , 1994 .

[57]  Terry Barrett,et al.  Studio Critiques of Student Art: As They Are, as They Could Be With Mentoring , 2000 .

[58]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Design Ideation Using TRIZ , 2006 .

[59]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements , 2000 .

[60]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[61]  Raymonde Guindon.  Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts , 1990 .

[62]  Craig Zimring,et al.  Defining Design between Domains: An Argument for Design Research á la Carte , 2001 .

[63]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .

[64]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[65]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[66]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[67]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[68]  Jesfis Peral,et al.  Heuristics -- intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving , 1984 .

[69]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[70]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[71]  Patrick Little,et al.  Use of “Studio” Methods in the Introductory Engineering Design Curriculum , 2001 .

[72]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Comparison of design approaches between engineers and industrial designers , 2013 .

[73]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies , 2010 .

[74]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Styling and design: intuition and analysis in industrial design☆ , 1997 .

[75]  A. Osborn.  Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving , 1957 .

[76]  E. Plotnick.  Concept Mapping: A Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship between Concepts. ERIC Digest. , 1997 .

[77]  Peter Winker,et al.  Applications of Heuristics in Finance , 2008 .