Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception.

We tested biological motion perception in a large group of unilateral stroke patients (N = 60). Both right and left hemisphere lesioned patients were significantly impaired compared with age-matched controls. Voxel-based lesion analyses revealed that lesions in superior temporal and premotor frontal areas had the greatest effect on biological motion perception. Moreover, the effect in each region was independent, and not attributable to indirect effects of lesions in the other area. When we explored functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data collected from neurologically healthy controls in a separate experiment in relation to the lesion maps, we found that the two methods converged on their findings. We thus establish that superior temporal and premotor areas are not only involved in biological motion perception, but also have causal relationships to deficits in biological motion perception. While the precise functional roles of each region remain to be identified, this network has been implicated in the perception of action stimuli in many studies and as such patients' deficits may reflect an inability to effectively engage the action observation system.

[1]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[2]  Stephen J. DeArmond,et al.  Structure of the human brain : a photographic atlas , 1974 .

[3]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[4]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[5]  J. Winn,et al.  Brain , 1878, The Lancet.

[6]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Aphasia and Associated Disorders: Taxonomy, Localization and Recovery , 1979 .

[7]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Benton Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual , 1983 .

[9]  R. Knight,et al.  The effects of lesions of superior temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobe on temporal and vertex components of the human AEP. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Perrett,et al.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  P. McLeod,et al.  Preserved and Impaired Detection of Structure From Motion by a 'Motion-blind" Patient , 1996 .

[18]  E. Procyk,et al.  Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[20]  T. Schenk,et al.  Visual motion perception after brain damage: II. Deficits in form-from-motion perception , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of Biological Motion , 1997, Perception.

[22]  R. Turner,et al.  Brain Areas Differentially Activated by Coherent Visual Motion and Dynamic Noise , 1998, NeuroImage.

[23]  A. Michell,et al.  MP44-04 IMPORTANCE OF THE ULTRASOUND CHARACTERISTICS OF REGIONS OF INTEREST BY MRI AND THE ADDITIONAL TARGET BIOPSY AROUND THEIR PERI-HYPOECHOIC LESIONS IN MR/TRUS SOFTWARE FUSION BIOPSY TO IMPROVE DETECTION RATE OF PROSTATE CANCER , 2023, Journal of Urology.

[24]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[25]  R. Adolphs,et al.  A Role for Somatosensory Cortices in the Visual Recognition of Emotion as Revealed by Three-Dimensional Lesion Mapping , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Cowey,et al.  Blindness to form from motion despite intact static form perception and motion detection , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[28]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[32]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  O. Braddick,et al.  Brain Areas Sensitive to Coherent Visual Motion , 2001, Perception.

[34]  D. Finkelhor,et al.  ADMINISTRATION AND SCORING MANUAL , 2001 .

[35]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[37]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Biological Motion Perception: an fMRI Study , 2022 .

[38]  J. Haxby,et al.  Parallel Visual Motion Processing Streams for Manipulable Objects and Human Movements , 2002, Neuron.

[39]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[40]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Perception and production of biological movement in patients with early periventricular brain lesions. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Perception of biological motion in parietal patients , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  E. Bates,et al.  Quantifying Dissociations in Neuropsychological Research , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[44]  F. Dick,et al.  Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  ß Federation of European Neuroscience Societies Mirror , 2003 .

[46]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect , 2003 .

[47]  Lucia M Vaina,et al.  Perceptual deficits in patients with impaired recognition of biological motion after temporal lobe lesions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  H. Karnath,et al.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  Chris Rorden,et al.  The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  N. Dronkers,et al.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension , 2004, Cognition.

[54]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Action comprehension in aphasia: linguistic and non-linguistic deficits and their lesion correlates , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  G. McCarthy,et al.  When Strangers Pass , 2004, Psychological science.

[57]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Dissociation between emotion and personality judgments: Convergent evidence from functional neuroimaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[59]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  E. Bates,et al.  Analyzing aphasia data in a multidimensional symptom space , 2005, Brain and Language.

[61]  M. Sereno,et al.  From monkeys to humans: what do we now know about brain homologies? , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[62]  T. Allison,et al.  Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Walking perception by walking observers. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Deficits of motion integration and segregation in patients with unilateral extrastriate lesions. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  G. Orban,et al.  Specificity of regions processing biological motion , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[66]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[67]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Patterns of fMRI Activity Dissociate Overlapping Functional Brain Areas that Respond to Biological Motion , 2006, Neuron.

[68]  R. Passingham,et al.  Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation , 2006, Current Biology.

[69]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[70]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception , 2006, Current Biology.

[71]  Satoshi Umeda,et al.  Gaze but not arrows: A dissociative impairment after right superior temporal gyrus damage , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  Ayse Pinar Saygin,et al.  Lesion correlates of conversational speech production deficits , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  Ayse Pinar Saygin,et al.  What is Involved and What is Necessary for Complex Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Auditory Processing: Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Lesion Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Structure from motion , 2008 .