Classification of Missense Mutations of Disease Genes

Clinical management of individuals found to harbor a mutation at a known disease-susceptibility gene depends on accurate assessment of mutation-specific disease risk. For missense mutations (MMs)—mutations that lead to a single amino acid change in the protein coded by the gene—this poses a particularly challenging problem. Because it is not possible to predict the structural and functional changes to the protein product for a given amino acid substitution, and because functional assays are often not available, disease association must be inferred from data on individuals with the mutation. Inference is complicated by small sample sizes and by sampling mechanisms that bias toward individuals at high familial risk of disease. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model to classify the disease association of MMs given pedigree data collected in the high-risk setting. The model's structure allows simultaneous characterization of multiple MMs. It uses a group of pedigrees identified through probands tested positive for known disease associated mutations and a group of test-negative pedigrees, both obtained from the same clinic, to calibrate classification and control for potential ascertainment bias. We apply this model to study MMs of breast-ovarian susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, using data collected at the Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina.

[1]  D. Easton,et al.  Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers , 2003 .

[2]  Celette Sugg Skinner,et al.  Pre-counseling education materials for BRCA testing: does tailoring make a difference? , 2002, Genetic testing.

[3]  A. Venkitaraman,et al.  Functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the biological response to DNA damage. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[4]  P. Møller,et al.  Functional analysis of BRCA1 C-terminal missense mutations identified in breast and ovarian cancer families. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[5]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic Testing-- Present and Future , 2000, Science.

[6]  J. Garber,et al.  Phenotypic characteristics associated with the APC gene I1307K mutation in Ashkenazi Jewish patients with colorectal polyps. , 2000, JAMA.

[7]  A. Ashworth,et al.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 2000, Current Biology.

[8]  A. Monteiro,et al.  Functional assay for BRCA1: mutagenesis of the COOH-terminal region reveals critical residues for transcription activation. , 2000, Cancer research.

[9]  D. Thomas,et al.  Bias and efficiency in family-based gene-characterization studies: conditional, prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  Genetic Susceptibility and Survival: Application to Breast Cancer , 2000 .

[11]  A. Venkitaraman,et al.  The breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2: at the crossroads between DNA replication and recombination? , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  D. Thomas Design of gene characterization studies: an overview. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[13]  A. de la Chapelle,et al.  Genetic susceptibility to non-polyposis colorectal cancer , 1999, Journal of medical genetics.

[14]  F. Rassool Inherited Susceptibility to Cancer: Clinical, Predictive and Ethical Perspectives , 1999, BMJ.

[15]  H. Lynch,et al.  GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TO NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL CANCER , 1999 .

[16]  G. Bonney,et al.  Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  I. Bleiweiss,et al.  Frequency and carrier risk associated with common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Missense mutations in disease genes: a Bayesian approach to evaluate causality. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  A. Neugut,et al.  Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J Chang-Claude,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  D. Berry,et al.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  C R Scriver,et al.  Proof of “disease causing” mutation , 1998, Human mutation.

[23]  C. Boland,et al.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  K. Kinzler,et al.  The Genetic Basis of Human Cancer , 1997 .

[25]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[26]  D E Goldgar,et al.  Cancer risks in two large breast cancer families linked to BRCA2 on chromosome 13q12-13. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  P. Hartge,et al.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  H Li,et al.  Semiparametric estimation of major gene and family-specific random effects for age of onset. , 1997, Biometrics.

[29]  D. Berry,et al.  Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  Kenneth Offit,et al.  The carrier frequency of the BRCA2 6174delT mutation among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals is approximately 1% , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[31]  D Rabinowitz,et al.  A pseudolikelihood approach to correcting for ascertainment bias in family studies. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[32]  Julian Peto,et al.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 , 1996, Nature.

[33]  H. Anton-Culver,et al.  BRCA1 R841W: a strong candidate for a common mutation with moderate phenotype. , 1996, Genetic epidemiology.

[34]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Genetic variation and human disease , 1996 .

[35]  F. Li,et al.  Identification and management of inherited cancer susceptibility. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[36]  T. Rebbeck,et al.  Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer. A guide for clinicians. , 1995, JAMA.

[37]  R C Elston,et al.  'Twixt cup and lip: how intractable is the ascertainment problem? , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[38]  S E Hodge,et al.  Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[39]  D. Easton,et al.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[40]  D V Dawson Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset. , 1994, American journal of medical genetics.

[41]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[42]  D. Thomas,et al.  Censored survival models for genetic epidemiology: A gibbs sampling approach , 1994, Genetic epidemiology.

[43]  P Laippala,et al.  Breast cancer patients--the support given by nurses. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[44]  Robert C. Elston,et al.  Ascertainment: An Overwiew of the Classical Segregation Analysis Model for Independent Sibships , 1991 .

[45]  Stanley Sawyer,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimators for incorrect models, with an application to ascertainment bias for continuous characters , 1990 .

[46]  D. Rao,et al.  A time‐dependent logistic hazard function for modeling variable age of onset in analysis of familial diseases , 1990, Genetic epidemiology.

[47]  R. Elston,et al.  Age of onset, age at examination, and other covariates in the analysis of family data , 1989, Genetic epidemiology.

[48]  W J Ewens,et al.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. II. Generalizations and numerical results. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[49]  W J Ewens,et al.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. I. Theory. , 1986, Theoretical population biology.

[50]  M. Boehnke,et al.  The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment. , 1984, American journal of human genetics.

[51]  E. Rc,et al.  Sampling considerations in the design and analysis of family studies. , 1984 .

[52]  R. Elston,et al.  Sampling considerations in the design and analysis of family studies. , 1984, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[53]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient , 1983, Oper. Res..

[54]  The estimation of phenotype distributions from pedigree data. , 1980, American journal of medical genetics.

[55]  R. Elston,et al.  Sampling considerations in the gathering and analysis of pedigree data. , 1979, American journal of human genetics.

[56]  R C Elston,et al.  Ascertainment and age of onset in pedigree analysis. , 1973, Human heredity.

[57]  R. Elston,et al.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. , 1971, Human heredity.

[58]  N. Morton Genetic tests under incomplete ascertainment. , 1959, American journal of human genetics.

[59]  R. Fisher THE EFFECT OF METHODS OF ASCERTAINMENT UPON THE ESTIMATION OF FREQUENCIES , 1934 .