Are Forensic Scientists Experts?

[1]  Moshe Kam,et al.  Proficiency of Professional Document Examiners in Writer Identification , 1994 .

[2]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  M. Kam,et al.  Writer Identification by Professional Document Examiners , 1997 .

[4]  Gary Klein,et al.  Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2017 .

[5]  M. Kam,et al.  Signature authentication by forensic document examiners. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Matching the faces of robbers captured on video , 2001 .

[7]  Bryan Found,et al.  Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  William C. Thompson,et al.  The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion , 2002 .

[9]  Bryan Found,et al.  The Initial Profiling Trial of a Program to Characterize Forensic Handwriting Examiners' Skill , 2003 .

[10]  M J Saks,et al.  Context effects in forensic science: a review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States. , 2003, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[11]  T. Busey,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts , 2005, Vision Research.

[12]  J. Koehler,et al.  The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science , 2005, Science.

[13]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Rare targets are often missed in visual search , 2005 .

[14]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[15]  I. Dror,et al.  Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[16]  David Charlton,et al.  Why Experts Make Errors , 2006 .

[17]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  E. Conant,et al.  Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. , 2007, Radiology.

[19]  Bryan Found,et al.  The probative character of Forensic Handwriting Examiners' identification and elimination opinions on questioned signatures. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[20]  Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. , 2009, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[21]  Law. Policy.  Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  R. Alicia,et al.  The innocence project , 2010 .

[24]  I. Dror,et al.  The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Bryan Found,et al.  Forensic handwriting examiners' opinions on the process of production of disguised and simulated signatures. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[26]  Itiel E. Dror,et al.  The Use of Technology in Human Expert Domains: Challenges and Risks Arising from the Use of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems in Forensic Science , 2010 .

[27]  Bryan Found,et al.  Forensic Document Examiners’ Skill in Distinguishing Between Natural and Disguised Handwriting Behaviors , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[28]  A. Burton,et al.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Jennifer L. Mnookin,et al.  The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences , 2011 .

[30]  C. Champod,et al.  Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[31]  Jonathan J. Koehler,et al.  Proficiency Tests to Estimate Error Rates in the Forensic Sciences , 2013 .

[32]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Duncan J. McCarthy,et al.  Identifying Fingerprint Expertise , 2011, Psychological science.

[34]  D. Kahneman.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[35]  Paul J. Speaker,et al.  Managing Performance in the Forensic Sciences: Expectations in Light of Limited Budgets , 2011 .

[36]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners , 2012, PloS one.

[37]  Jane Taylor,et al.  Context Effects and Observer Bias—Implications for Forensic Odontology , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

[38]  A. Burton,et al.  Crowd Effects in Unfamiliar Face Matching , 2013 .

[39]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[40]  I. Dror,et al.  The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. , 2013 .

[41]  Ian Watkins,et al.  The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect. , 2013, Law and human behavior.

[42]  A. Burton,et al.  Passport Officers’ Errors in Face Matching , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  R. Kemp,et al.  How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers , 2014 .

[44]  Before the high court , 2014 .

[45]  J. Tangen,et al.  The Nature of Expertise in Fingerprint Matching: Experts Can Do a Lot with a Little , 2014, PloS one.

[46]  Duncan J. McCarthy,et al.  Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints. , 2014, Law and human behavior.

[47]  S. Kassin,et al.  Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias. , 2014, Law and human behavior.

[48]  Klas Brorsson Läthén,et al.  The Effect of Image Quality and Forensic Expertise in Facial Image Comparisons , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

[49]  Matthew Q. Hill,et al.  Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  W Kerkhoff,et al.  Design and results of an exploratory double blind testing program in firearms examination. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[51]  David White,et al.  Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software , 2015, PloS one.

[52]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetic specificity of face recognition , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Moshe Kam,et al.  Simulation Detection in Handwritten Documents by Forensic Document Examiners , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

[54]  M. Bindemann,et al.  Matching Faces Against the Clock , 2016, i-Perception.

[55]  R. Kemp,et al.  Model forensic science , 2016 .

[56]  G. Edmond.  Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence , 2016 .

[57]  An Empirical Research Agenda for the Forensic Sciences , 2016 .

[58]  J. Koehler.  Forensics or Fauxrensics? Ascertaining Accuracy in the Forensic Sciences , 2016 .

[59]  Macgregor D Vogelsang,et al.  Holistic processing of fingerprints by expert forensic examiners , 2017, Cognitive Research.

[60]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  What is a super-recogniser? , 2017 .

[61]  J. Tangen,et al.  The style of a stranger: Identification expertise generalizes to coarser level categories , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  Jason M Tangen,et al.  Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class , 2017, PloS one.

[63]  G. Edmond,et al.  Rethinking Expert Opinion Evidence , 2017 .

[64]  R. Kemp,et al.  Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners. , 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[65]  David White,et al.  Evaluating the Feature Comparison Strategy for Forensic Face Identification , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[66]  G. Edmond,et al.  Peer review in forensic science. , 2017, Forensic science international.

[67]  J. Tangen,et al.  The Emergence of Perceptual Expertise with Fingerprints Over Time , 2017 .

[68]  K. Martire.  Clear communication through clear purpose: understanding statistical statements made by forensic scientists , 2018 .

[69]  Richard I. Kemp,et al.  Considerations when designing human performance tests in the forensic sciences , 2018 .