论文信息 - Reply [to “Comment on ‘Communicating with uncertainty: A critical issue with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis’” by R. M. W. Musson]

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Communicating with uncertainty: A critical issue with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis’” by R. M. W. Musson]

Musson's comments on our article are an example of myths and misunderstandings. We did not say that probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is a bad method, but we did say that it has some limitations that have significant implications. Our response to these comments follows.

Zhenming Wang | Baoping Shi | Edward W. Woolery | John D. Keifer

[1] Robert J. Budnitz,et al. Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts , 1997 .

[2] R. Mcguire. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3] Baoping Shi,et al. Communicating with uncertainty: A critical issue with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis , 2003 .

[4] S. Harmsen,et al. Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps , 2002 .

[5] Julian J. Bommer,et al. The Challenge of Defining Upper Bounds on Earthquake Ground Motions , 2004 .